You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Note: there are Visual Studio tests run in CI, and so far, none of them seems to suffer from LLU vs ULL. Btw, both suffixes are supposed to be valid according to C99 and C11 standards.
So I guess this outcome may depend on the exact version number of Visual Studio, and it's unfortunate that we can't test the failing versions with Github Actions, presumably because they are older than support limit. This situation would force us to deploy a "blind" fix, without observing the success (or the drawbacks).
LLU is a correct prefix according to C99 & C11 standards (but not C90).
However, older versions of Visual Studio do not work with it.
Replace by ULL, which doesn't have this issue.
Fixes#3647
LLU is a correct prefix according to C99 & C11 standards (but not C90).
However, older versions of Visual Studio do not work with it.
Replace by ULL, which doesn't have this issue.
Fixesfacebook#3647
VS2010 x86 doesn't accept LLU suffix in numbers:
C2059: syntax error : 'bad suffix on number'.
zstd.h file:
ULL
suffix probably fixes such issues.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: