You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 31, 2023. It is now read-only.
Hi, thank you so much for your work. I would like to understand better on your tpr95 method.
Q1. For obtaining the results of FPR at 95% TPR, I would like to understand why the values of start and end were different when comparing your algorithm vs the baseline method, which uses an end of 0.1 and 0.01 for CIFAR10 and CIFAR100 respectively?
Q2. For the same function, how are the values "if tpr <= 0.9505 and tpr >= 0.9495:" chosen for 95% TPR? As in is it based on 4 decimal places or some other approach. I experimented with other datasets and models, and found that there were zerodivision errors errors if the tpr was slightly above 0.9505 (like 0.9545 for example)
Thank you so much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hi, thank you so much for your work. I would like to understand better on your tpr95 method.
Q1. For obtaining the results of FPR at 95% TPR, I would like to understand why the values of start and end were different when comparing your algorithm vs the baseline method, which uses an end of 0.1 and 0.01 for CIFAR10 and CIFAR100 respectively?
Q2. For the same function, how are the values "if tpr <= 0.9505 and tpr >= 0.9495:" chosen for 95% TPR? As in is it based on 4 decimal places or some other approach. I experimented with other datasets and models, and found that there were zerodivision errors errors if the tpr was slightly above 0.9505 (like 0.9545 for example)
Thank you so much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: