-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Zenodo to the registries check? #38
Comments
Just to clarify, there is a test for presence of a Zenodo badge, but it is part of the citation checks, not the registry checks |
Is there any reason why Zenodo has not been added to the list of registries other than "nobody submitted a PR"? It's listed on https://github.com/NLeSC/awesome-research-software-registries, so why shouldn't it count? |
The reasoning at the time was that Zenodo as a community registry does not serve the purpose of discovery very well, i.e. items in Zenodo are not ranked well by search engines. FWIW I still agree with this. |
What is the decision making process here? Is it possible to re-open it to give zenodo inclusion another shot? |
The OSSR (also now member of SciCodes) currently uses zenodo's communities as its authoritative source of truth. So using zenodo or "being part of some list of communities" would be highly welcomed by projects using the OSSR. |
If Zenodo were added to the list of registries to check against, this would cover an awful lot of "generic" software releases, e.g., those that don't go into any of the language/packaging registries, e.g., if it's distributed as binary/zip.
As far as I can see, there are two ways to achieve this:
isSupplementTo
record for this repo).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: