Check-only moves?
#841
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This isn't supported yet, but would be a nice generalization of the king-facing rule, so I converted this discussion to issue #842 as a feature request. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Is it possible to define moves that cannot capture, but can deliver check? In extended Betza notation I introduced the k for this, as an alternative to m and c. This made it for instance possible to describe the King-facing rule in Xiangqi with an extra fkR move on the Kings.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions