Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 12, 2024. It is now read-only.

Considerations on animal groups #66

Open
woodbri opened this issue Aug 29, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Considerations on animal groups #66

woodbri opened this issue Aug 29, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@woodbri
Copy link
Collaborator

woodbri commented Aug 29, 2018

Jess said:

It'd help to be able to set different management considerations for different animal groups
as well as for different paddocks.

Considerations on a paddock are more about exclusions and possible tagging a paddock for a non-grazing usage. What are your thoughts for considerations on an animal group? Is it just a comment that you want displayed somewhere to remind you of something? Where/when would you like it displayed. Can you give me a couple of examples of a consideration on an animal group that you would like to apply?

@mstenta
Copy link
Member

mstenta commented Sep 6, 2018

This strikes me as a general farmOS feature request, not specific to grazing, so I added the farmOS core label. (Note that "considerations" are a farmOS core feature.)

Once we talk through the use-cases, we can decide if this is something that fits into the "plan considerations" feature as they currently exist (which are strictly for "plan" entity types in farmOS), or if it would be more of a general "asset management" feature.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants