Improve test coverage

[kibertoad]

Prerequisites

• I have written a descriptive issue title
• I have searched existing issues to ensure the issue has not already been raised

Issue

We have around 50% code coverage.
We can do better.

[Uzlopak]

We have now better coverage.

test coverage in master:

Statements   : 65.55% ( 940/1434 )
Branches     : 54.82% ( 506/923 )
Functions    : 71.9% ( 87/121 )
Lines        : 64.87% ( 857/1321 )

Should we increase the hard coded limits?

Curently:

    "lines": 51,
    "statements": 51,
    "functions": 49,
    "branches": 43

or maybe we wait till we merge #50 , which results that our test coverage will increase drastically
test coverage in replace-encodings branch

Statements   : 93.53% ( 810/866 )
Branches     : 86.8% ( 454/523 )
Functions    : 95.45% ( 63/66 )
Lines        : 96.41% ( 727/754 )

[kibertoad]

We should!
and yes, let's do it after the merge

[Uzlopak]

Yeah.

=============================== Coverage summary ===============================
Statements   : 95.52% ( 812/850 )
Branches     : 90.34% ( 449/497 )
Functions    : 95.45% ( 63/66 )
Lines        : 97.07% ( 731/753 )
================================================================================

[gurgunday]

Alright, just closing this to prevent duplicates

And I chose this one because the coverage was improved technically, as the title describes :D

Now we go for 100% 🚀