-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The build fails. #1
Comments
@jackorp could you take a look? |
Yes, I forgot to put an issue up that I am working on it. I am currently testing how much work does protobuf need to satisfy cucumber-messages, i.e. if we can not use the protobuf-cucumber fork. AFAIK these methods were implemented, the way it is expecting, in 2 open PRs: protobuf#411 and protobuf#415. I hope that once I create respective patches in the rubygem-protobuf I will be able to successfully build cucumber-messages. |
I succeeded in building both the rubygem protobuf and the rubygem cucumber messages. However, I did not find a way to make it work without creating a diff from the newest protobuf-cucumber fork version to the last protobuf version. For my solution see rubygem protobuf spec. I tried these approaches: |
So, basically, we're getting Did all the all other approaches failed? |
yes that is true.
Yes, I did not succeed in applying the mentioned PRs in a way that would satisfy tests in cucumber messages and I don't feel like scouting the protobuf-cucumber source repo for the actual difference to identify where it splits from pull requests. I tried a bit but realized very soon that it would take me a few days which IMHO is not worth it. |
Maybe we should simply have it provide Alternatively, we could package protobuf-cucumber directly (I don't favor this option). I'd the reflect change in the I'd also love to see this resolved / negotiated with upstream. @voxik WDYT? |
After an off-issue discussion with @pvalena I gave it one more try and found out finally what made the difference (badly resolved merge conflict JFTR). Rubygem-protobuf build now succeeds from the PRs and cucumber-messages build succeeds as well (failure is there only because I didn't bump the NVR). I plan to ping the protobuf upstream about how the status of the PRs. |
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/2063172
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: