-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Frequently Asked Questions about software patents-2.html
166 lines (140 loc) · 25.4 KB
/
Frequently Asked Questions about software patents-2.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<html>
<!-- Mirrored from ffii.org/Frequently Asked Questions about software patents by HTTrack Website Copier/3.x [XR&CO'2014], Tue, 05 Feb 2019 09:46:01 GMT -->
<!-- Added by HTTrack --><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" /><!-- /Added by HTTrack -->
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8">
<meta name="robots" content="index,nofollow">
<title>Frequently Asked Questions about software patents - FFII</title>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://ffii.org/static/common/js/common.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
var search_hint = "Search";
//-->
</script>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" charset="utf-8" media="all" href="https://ffii.org/static/sinorca4moin/css/common.css">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" charset="utf-8" media="screen" href="https://ffii.org/static/sinorca4moin/css/screen.css">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" charset="utf-8" media="print" href="https://ffii.org/static/sinorca4moin/css/print.css">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" charset="utf-8" media="projection" href="https://ffii.org/static/sinorca4moin/css/projection.css">
<!-- css only for MS IE6/IE7 browsers -->
<!--[if lt IE 8]>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" charset="utf-8" media="all" href="/static/sinorca4moin/css/msie.css">
<![endif]-->
<link rel="Start" href="https://ffii.org/Home">
<link rel="Alternate" title="Wiki Markup" href="https://ffii.org/Frequently Asked Questions about software patents?action=raw">
<link rel="Alternate" media="print" title="Print View" href="https://ffii.org/Frequently Asked Questions about software patents?action=print">
<link rel="Search" href="https://ffii.org/FindPage">
<link rel="Index" href="https://ffii.org/TitleIndex">
<link rel="Glossary" href="https://ffii.org/WordIndex">
<link rel="Help" href="https://ffii.org/HelpOnFormatting">
</head>
<body lang="en" dir="ltr">
<div id="header">
<div class="superHeader">
<div class="right">
<ul id="username"><li><a href="https://ffii.org/Frequently Asked Questions about software patents?action=login" id="login" rel="nofollow">Login</a></li></ul>
</div>
</div>
<form id="searchform" method="get" action="https://ffii.org/Frequently Asked Questions about software patents">
<div>
<input type="hidden" name="action" value="fullsearch">
<input type="hidden" name="context" value="180">
<label for="searchinput">Search:</label>
<input id="searchinput" type="text" name="value" value="" size="20"
onfocus="searchFocus(this)" onblur="searchBlur(this)"
onkeyup="searchChange(this)" onchange="searchChange(this)" alt="Search">
<input id="titlesearch" name="titlesearch" type="submit"
value="Titles" alt="Search Titles">
<input id="fullsearch" name="fullsearch" type="submit"
value="Text" alt="Search Full Text">
</div>
</form>
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--// Initialize search form
var f = document.getElementById('searchform');
f.getElementsByTagName('label')[0].style.display = 'none';
var e = document.getElementById('searchinput');
searchChange(e);
searchBlur(e);
//-->
</script>
<div class="midHeader">
<div id="locationline">
<div id="logo"><a href="https://ffii.org/Home"><img src="https://www.ffii.org/img/ffii-logos/ffii-logo-transparent.gif" width="85" height="98" alt="FFII logo"></a></div>
<a href="https://ffii.org/Home">FFII</a>
</div>
</div>
<div class="subHeader">
<b> <a href="https://www.ffii.org/">FFII</a> | <a href="https://action.ffii.org/">Action groups</a> | <a href="https://press.ffii.org/">Press releases</a> | <a href="http://www.ffii.fr/">FFII.fr</a> | <a href="http://www.ffii.de/">FFII.de</a> | <a href="http://www.ffii.se/">FFII.se</a> | <a href="http://www.ffii.org.uk/">FFII.org.uk</a> </b>
</div>
</div>
<div id="sidebar">
<div class="sidepanel">
<h1>Get Involved</h1>
<ul class="editbar">
<li class="wikilink"><a href="http://twitter.com/ffii/">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
<li class="wikilink"><a href="http://blog.ffii.org/">Our Blog</a></li>
<li class="wikilink"><a href="https://ffii.org/Donations">Donate to FFII</a></li>
<li class="wikilink"><a href="http://members.ffii.org/register/">Become a member</a></li>
</ul>
<h1>Software Patents</h1>
<ul class="editbar">
<li class="wikilink"><a href="https://ffii.org/Frequently_Asked_Questions_about_software_patents">FAQ</a></li>
<li class="wikilink"><a href="http://webshop.ffii.org/">Patented Webshop</a></li>
</ul>
<h1>Mailing Lists</h1>
<ul class="editbar">
<li class="wikilink"><a href="http://lists.ffii.org/mailman/listinfo/softwarepatents">Software-Patents</a></li>
<li class="wikilink"><a href="http://lists.ffii.org/mailman/listinfo/openstandards/">Open Standards</a></li>
<li class="wikilink"><a href="http://lists.ffii.org/mailman/listinfo/floss/">Free & Open Source</a></li>
<li class="wikilink"><a href="http://lists.ffii.org/mailman/listinfo/netreg/">Open Networks</a></li>
<li class="wikilink"><a href="https://ffii.org/https://lists.ffii.org/mailman/listinfo/volunteers">Volunteers</a></li>
<li class="wikilink"><a href="http://lists.ffii.org/">More Lists</a></li>
</ul>
<h1>Association</h1>
<ul class="editbar">
<li class="wikilink"><a href="https://ffii.org/Mission">Mission</a></li>
<li class="wikilink"><a href="https://ffii.org/National_chapters">European chapters</a></li>
<li class="wikilink"><a href="http://blog.ffii.org/tag/press/">Press Releases</a></li>
<li class="wikilink"><a href="https://ffii.org/Contact">Contact Office</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<div id="page" lang="en" dir="ltr">
<h1 id="title">Frequently Asked Questions about software patents</h1>
<div dir="ltr" id="content" lang="en"><span class="anchor" id="top"></span>
<span class="anchor" id="line-1"></span><p class="line867"><div class="table-of-contents"><p class="table-of-contents-heading">Contents<ol><li>
<a href="#Protection_of_investment">Protection of investment</a></li><li>
<a href="#Current_situation">Current situation</a></li><li>
<a href="#Trivial_patents">Trivial patents</a></li><li>
<a href="#Software_patents_and_Free_Software">Software patents and Free Software</a></li><li>
<a href="#Proposals_for_a_Solution">Proposals for a Solution</a></li></ol></div> <span class="anchor" id="line-2"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-3"></span><p class="line867">
<h1 id="Protection_of_investment">Protection of investment</h1>
<span class="anchor" id="line-4"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-5"></span><p class="line867"><strong>'Isn't protection by patents necessary in order to protect one's investment against copying? There is no progress without such protection!</strong>' <span class="anchor" id="line-6"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-7"></span><p class="line874">Copyright is the perfect protection of investment for software. <span class="anchor" id="line-8"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-9"></span><p class="line874">Copyright has served well during the last twenty years as the motor of the software industry. With software it works even better than with books. One of the reasons is that in software a strict separation between editable source code and executable binary code is possible. <span class="anchor" id="line-10"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-11"></span><p class="line874">Software patents, on the other hand, are only used strategically in the current practice—i.e. in the USA. As investment protection they are much too inflexible, since they require waiting times ranging from six months to a few years and cost several tens of thousand of Euros. Copyright becomes effective automatically and immediately. <span class="anchor" id="line-12"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-13"></span><p class="line874">Maybe there are a few companies which could profit from software patents, but nobody can seriously argue that software patents are useful for the whole industry. <span class="anchor" id="line-14"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-15"></span><p class="line867"><strong>'If a developer has spent much time in an epoch-making algorithm, wouldn't it be appropriate to reward him with a patent?</strong>' <span class="anchor" id="line-16"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-17"></span><p class="line874">The developer can, with copyright as investment protection, transform his discovery into software. This has been working very well in the past. <span class="anchor" id="line-18"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-19"></span><p class="line874">A potential imitator who only knows the original as executable binary code, but not the source code, must spend the same amount of work as the original developer. On which economical or moral reason should he be prohibited from doing so? <span class="anchor" id="line-20"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-21"></span><p class="line874">The small inventor who obtains wealth from a patent and hard work is, by the way, nothing more than a nice fairy tale. In hard reality the biggest companies of the world are using patents in the hundreds as weapons against each other or against smaller and more flexible competitors. <span class="anchor" id="line-22"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-23"></span><p class="line867"><strong>'Then I take out a patent for a basic technique and become rich!</strong>' <span class="anchor" id="line-24"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-25"></span><p class="line874">This only works if you do not develop software yourself, but concentrate completely on patents. There are several companies living on a business model like this. <span class="anchor" id="line-26"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-27"></span><p class="line874">But as soon as you develop software yourself, you cannot avoid infringing on patents of large companies and will not be able to effectively prosecute them because of infringement on your own patents. <span class="anchor" id="line-28"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-29"></span><p class="line867">
<h1 id="Current_situation">Current situation</h1>
<span class="anchor" id="line-30"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-31"></span><p class="line867"><strong>'All the time I read “European software patents”. I thought they do not exist currently, but should only be allowed in future?</strong>' <span class="anchor" id="line-32"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-33"></span><p class="line874">That's not true. About 30,000 European software patents have been granted without a sufficient legal base. The current jurisprudence (“status quo”) differs very much from the current state of law (art. 52 EPC). <span class="anchor" id="line-34"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-35"></span><p class="line867"><strong>'The European patent offices and courts are not stupid and will be able to prevent trivial patents and defend the respectable entrepreneur against absurd claims.</strong>' <span class="anchor" id="line-36"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-37"></span><p class="line874">The European patent offices already have granted thousands and thousands of trivial patents, e.g. patent no. EP 394160 on the progress bar or patent no. DE10108564 on reception of e-mail; this against current law (Art. 52 EPC), which clearly prohibits software patents. <span class="anchor" id="line-38"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-39"></span><p class="line874">Even assuming European courts would have enough expert knowledge to see through a patent lawyer operating with expert vocabulary, in most cases it is sufficient to threaten legal action with a case value of millions of Euros in order to force a small or medium company or even a single developer to give up. <span class="anchor" id="line-40"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-41"></span><p class="line874">In the USA current legal cases impressively show where the development leads. Our only chance is to give no ground to those cases; this means retaining the current legal situation. <span class="anchor" id="line-42"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-43"></span><p class="line867"><strong>'Isn't the battle already won? The European Parliament rejected the software patents directive in July 2005.</strong>' <span class="anchor" id="line-44"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-45"></span><p class="line874">There are new attempts to introduce software patents, such as the Community Patent. <span class="anchor" id="line-46"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-47"></span><p class="line874">The Community Patent is the idea that inventions will only be patented in the EU, instead of having to register a patent in the patent office of each EU country. This seems like a good idea, but the problem is in the details. Current plans don't even mention the subject of software, although software patentability is one of the main drivers of these plans. Instead of directly imposing software patentability, the proposal is now to remove the patent system even further from legislative review by any democratically elected parliament. Thus in effect legislative power is handed over to a few top judges and to the circle of administrative officials that is running the European Patent Office and the EU Council's patent policy working party. There are even moves to explicitly make EPO case law binding on the new EU patent institutions. Of course all this goes without mentioning the word "software" or "computer", but the underlying issue is clearly understood. <span class="anchor" id="line-48"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-49"></span><p class="line874">The Community Patent has failed for 25 years due to resistance from many quarters within the patent lobby itself. If now suddenly this resistance can be overcome, there isn't much need to explain what is the driving force that is overcoming it. <span class="anchor" id="line-50"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-51"></span><p class="line867">
<h1 id="Trivial_patents">Trivial patents</h1>
<span class="anchor" id="line-52"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-53"></span><p class="line867"><strong>'Wouldn't it be better to solve the problem of trivial patents by demanding a minimum level of invention instead of not accepting software patents in general?</strong>' <span class="anchor" id="line-54"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-55"></span><p class="line874">All recent experiences clearly show that this will not work. <span class="anchor" id="line-56"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-57"></span><p class="line874">The software patents already granted in Europe strongly show that patent offices are not able to prevent trivial patents. So the often stated better quality of European patent examinations is pure fiction. <span class="anchor" id="line-58"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-59"></span><p class="line867"><strong>'Aren't trivial patents an exception?</strong>' <span class="anchor" id="line-60"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-61"></span><p class="line862">No, they're the rule. If you have experience in software programming, it should be easy for you to convince yourself. The FFII has collected and documented about 10,000 of about 30,000 European software patents, available via <a class="http" href="http://eupat.ffii.org/patente/">http://eupat.ffii.org/patente/</a>. Randomly pick any of these patents, read and understand the claims and judge for yourself: <span class="anchor" id="line-62"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-63"></span><ul><li>How large do you think is the effort for getting from the problem to the patented solution idea, in comparison to the effort for reading the patent application document? <span class="anchor" id="line-64"></span></li><li>How high do you think is the probability that a programmer could accidentally violate a patent not known to him? <span class="anchor" id="line-65"></span></li><li>If a customer would ask you to solve exactly this problem, how probable would you think it was that your independently developed solution would violate this patent? <span class="anchor" id="line-66"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-67"></span></li></ul><p class="line862">For a small number of those patents we have an easy understandable short explanation; see <a class="http" href="http://eupat.ffii.org/patents/samples/">http://eupat.ffii.org/patents/samples/</a>. <span class="anchor" id="line-68"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-69"></span><p class="line874">One of the original aims of the patent system is the documentation of knowledge in patent applications. At this point it should be noted that this kind of “documentation of knowledge” in patents is completely useless for the programmer. <span class="anchor" id="line-70"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-71"></span><p class="line867">
<h1 id="Software_patents_and_Free_Software">Software patents and Free Software</h1>
<span class="anchor" id="line-72"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-73"></span><p class="line867"><strong>'Wouldn't it be better to vote for an exception for free software instead of trying to prevent software patents altogether?</strong>' <span class="anchor" id="line-74"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-75"></span><p class="line874">Such an exception would be the same as prohibition of software patents in general, since free software may be commercial software as well. The proponents of software patents know this and try to exploit this misunderstanding so that there will be at most an exception for non-commercial software. With this, nothing would be won, since a patent only claims commercial use of an idea. The possibility of commercial use is an important point of free software. <span class="anchor" id="line-76"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-77"></span><p class="line867"><strong>'Some free-software-projects are developed non-commercially. Could they be attacked by software patents at all?</strong>' <span class="anchor" id="line-78"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-79"></span><p class="line874">Yes. The patent owner can claim that the existence of this free software hurts him commercially. <span class="anchor" id="line-80"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-81"></span><p class="line874">Especially in the case of a non-commercial development, the mere threat of a lawsuit is often sufficient to force the developers to abandon the project. This is because there are no monetary means to finance the lawsuit. <span class="anchor" id="line-82"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-83"></span><p class="line867"><strong>'Can software which is distributed as source code be attacked by patents at all? (“source code privilege”)</strong>' <span class="anchor" id="line-84"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-85"></span><p class="line874">According to an early draft of the now rejected software partents directive, software could be attacked only from the moment when it would be executed on a computer; thus, not the author, but the customer would be liable. This wouldn't help me as the author, however, since my customer would hold me liable for patent claims by third parties. <span class="anchor" id="line-86"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-87"></span><p class="line874">The later draft of the European Council contained a new article, by which publication of source code could already be a direct infringement. <span class="anchor" id="line-88"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-89"></span><p class="line867"><strong>'If software patents are so dangerous for free software, why does free software also exist and grow in countries which have software patents?</strong>' <span class="anchor" id="line-90"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-91"></span><p class="line874">The great success of Free Software easily makes one oversee the damage already done by software patents. Some of the projects which had to be given up due to software patents were Free Software. <span class="anchor" id="line-92"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-93"></span><p class="line874">As long as software patents in Europe offically do not exist, many patent holders abstain from charges, because a wave of legal cases would heat up the debate about European software patents. <span class="anchor" id="line-94"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-95"></span><p class="line867">
<h1 id="Proposals_for_a_Solution">Proposals for a Solution</h1>
<span class="anchor" id="line-96"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-97"></span><p class="line867"><strong>'Wouldn't it be a useful compromise to grant software patents for five years only?</strong>' <span class="anchor" id="line-98"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-99"></span><p class="line874">A shorter patent duration would of course shorten the duration of damage. <span class="anchor" id="line-100"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-101"></span><p class="line874">But this is not allowed by international law: the TRIPS agreement demands a minimum duration of patents of at least 20 years. <span class="anchor" id="line-102"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-103"></span><p class="line867"><strong>'Isn't is possible to work around software patents and use alternative methods? For example Ogg/Vorbis instead of MP3?</strong>' <span class="anchor" id="line-104"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-105"></span><p class="line874">In some cases it is really possible. The Ogg/Vorbis developers have done patent research and hope their format won't violate patents in the USA. On the other side, there are many areas where patents are so central and broad that working around them is impossible (e.g. panorama images). <span class="anchor" id="line-106"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-107"></span><p class="line874">But you can never be sure: patent research is not reliable. Even JPEG was believed for many years not to be covered by any patents. Now courts have to decide whether this is indeed true. <span class="anchor" id="line-108"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-109"></span><p class="line874">At least it is always a competitive drawback if you have to work around a file format which has been established as a de facto standard. Especially in the software sector, interoperability is very important. <span class="anchor" id="line-110"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-111"></span><p class="line867"><strong>'What should happen instead?</strong>' <span class="anchor" id="line-112"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-113"></span><p class="line874">Since software patents have been proven to have a negative impact on the economy they should not be granted at all. <span class="anchor" id="line-114"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-115"></span><p class="line874">A revision of the patent laws should make this clear. In practice a more narrow definition of the word “technical” is necessary. <span class="anchor" id="line-116"></span><span class="anchor" id="bottom"></span></div><p id="pageinfo" class="info" lang="en" dir="ltr">Frequently Asked Questions about software patents (last edited 2014-05-11 09:30:37 by <span title="Rene MAGES @ ANice-653-1-533-198.w86-205.abo.wanadoo.fr[86.205.241.198]"><a href="https://ffii.org/mages" title="Rene MAGES @ ANice-653-1-533-198.w86-205.abo.wanadoo.fr[86.205.241.198]">mages</a></span>)</p>
<ul id="iconbar">
<li><a href="https://ffii.org/Frequently Asked Questions about software patents?action=edit" rel="nofollow" title="Edit"><img alt="Edit" height="12" src="https://ffii.org/static/sinorca4moin/img/moin-edit.png" title="Edit" width="12" /></a></li>
<li><a href="https://ffii.org/Frequently Asked Questions about software patents" rel="nofollow" title="View"><img alt="View" height="13" src="https://ffii.org/static/sinorca4moin/img/moin-show.png" title="View" width="12" /></a></li>
<li><a href="https://ffii.org/Frequently Asked Questions about software patents?action=diff" rel="nofollow" title="Diffs"><img alt="Diffs" height="11" src="https://ffii.org/static/sinorca4moin/img/moin-diff.png" title="Diffs" width="15" /></a></li>
<li><a href="https://ffii.org/Frequently Asked Questions about software patents?action=info" rel="nofollow" title="Info"><img alt="Info" height="11" src="https://ffii.org/static/sinorca4moin/img/moin-info.png" title="Info" width="12" /></a></li>
<li><a href="https://ffii.org/Frequently Asked Questions about software patents?action=subscribe" rel="nofollow" title="Subscribe"><img alt="Subscribe" height="10" src="https://ffii.org/static/sinorca4moin/img/moin-subscribe.png" title="Subscribe" width="14" /></a></li>
<li><a href="https://ffii.org/Frequently Asked Questions about software patents?action=raw" rel="nofollow" title="Raw"><img alt="Raw" height="13" src="https://ffii.org/static/sinorca4moin/img/moin-raw.png" title="Raw" width="12" /></a></li>
<li><a href="https://ffii.org/Frequently Asked Questions about software patents?action=print" rel="nofollow" title="Print"><img alt="Print" height="14" src="https://ffii.org/static/sinorca4moin/img/moin-print.png" title="Print" width="16" /></a></li>
</ul>
<div id="pagebottom"></div>
</div>
<div id="footer">
<ul id="credits">
<li><a href="http://moinmo.in/" title="This site uses the MoinMoin Wiki software.">MoinMoin Powered</a></li><li><a href="http://moinmo.in/Python" title="MoinMoin is written in Python.">Python Powered</a></li><li><a href="http://moinmo.in/GPL" title="MoinMoin is GPL licensed.">GPL licensed</a></li><li><a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer" title="Click here to validate this page.">Valid HTML 4.01</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<p id="copyright_notice">Copyright (C) 2000-2015 FFII e.V.</p><p id="hosting_sponsor">Hosting sponsored by <a href="http://www.netgate.de/">Netgate</a> and <a href="http://www.init7.com/">Init Seven AG</a></p></body>
<!-- Mirrored from ffii.org/Frequently Asked Questions about software patents by HTTrack Website Copier/3.x [XR&CO'2014], Tue, 05 Feb 2019 09:46:01 GMT -->
</html>