Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extension Hub: Grouping based on further labels #908

Open
detlefarend opened this issue Jan 30, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Extension Hub: Grouping based on further labels #908

detlefarend opened this issue Jan 30, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
admin Administrative task enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@detlefarend
Copy link
Member

detlefarend commented Jan 30, 2024

Currently, the extension hub shows repos grouped by the type of owner (organisation or single contributor). The systematics shall be extended based on new standard labels as follows:

New labels

  • wrapper - Wrapper for a 3rd party package
  • thesis - related code of a thesis (bachelor, master, doctoral)
  • framework - framework for a particular topic
  • project - ML project
  • sample - sample code
  • commercial - product is to be bought

New grouping systematics

  • By owner
  • By type (see new labels above)
@detlefarend detlefarend self-assigned this Jan 30, 2024
@detlefarend detlefarend added enhancement New feature or request admin Administrative task labels Jan 30, 2024
@detlefarend
Copy link
Member Author

@laxmikantbaheti @steveyuwono: do you have further ideas to group/structure our extension hub?

@steveyuwono
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @detlefarend, is it necessary to categorize them based on the owners? Maybe we can categorize them regardless of who the owners are, as follows:

  • Wrappers
  • Enhancement Framework
  • Research
    • Theses
    • Publications
  • Project
  • Others

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
admin Administrative task enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants