You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
as kubus mentioned, 25% is for gas limit overestimation not for gas fee cap. And gas estimation improvements are discussed in filecoin-project/specs-actors#1319
Describe the bug
While my lotus send a message with a much higher gas cap than current basefee? 4.854533891 height 293155 nanoFIL vs 2.025 at height 293165
message id
https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebbqljqhfmm2zxx4z2ntyifm32rujylvpco3jdy5ij4hygukzhyp4
Gas Fee Cap tip:
4.854533891 nanoFIL
Gas Premium tip :
100,315 attoFIL
Gas Limit tip:
10,299,650
Base fee history
https://filfox.info/api/v1/stats/base-fee?duration=24h&samples=48
{
“height”: 293124,
“timestamp”: 1607100120,
“baseFee”: “2025893537"
},
{
“height”: 293184,
“timestamp”: 1607101920,
“baseFee”: “2041509849"
},
If this is the default behavior of lotus sending message mechanism, it might cause everyone increase gas fee unconsciously.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
Gas cap should be equivalent or slightly higher than base fee.
Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
Version (run
lotus version
):lotus version
Daemon: 1.2.1+git.df66f48f6+api1.0.0
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: