Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sealing pipeline: Output DDO pieces in SectorStatus #11709

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2024

Conversation

magik6k
Copy link
Contributor

@magik6k magik6k commented Mar 12, 2024

Related Issues

@LexLuthr reported on slack that lotus-miner doesn't return PieceInfos for DDO deals - https://filecoinproject.slack.com/archives/C06GD1SS56Y/p1710190186610709

Proposed Changes

Additional Info

Checklist

Before you mark the PR ready for review, please make sure that:

  • Commits have a clear commit message.
  • PR title is in the form of of <PR type>: <area>: <change being made>
    • example: fix: mempool: Introduce a cache for valid signatures
    • PR type: fix, feat, build, chore, ci, docs, perf, refactor, revert, style, test
    • area, e.g. api, chain, state, market, mempool, multisig, networking, paych, proving, sealing, wallet, deps
  • If the PR affects users (e.g., new feature, bug fix, system requirements change), update the CHANGELOG.md and add details to the UNRELEASED section.
  • New features have usage guidelines and / or documentation updates in
  • Tests exist for new functionality or change in behavior
  • CI is green

@magik6k magik6k requested a review from a team as a code owner March 12, 2024 08:18
@jennijuju jennijuju changed the base branch from release/v1.26.0 to master March 12, 2024 08:39
@jennijuju jennijuju changed the base branch from master to release/v1.26.0 March 12, 2024 08:40
@magik6k magik6k force-pushed the fix/lm-sector-status branch from 92d0077 to a8e88e7 Compare March 12, 2024 08:46
@LexLuthr LexLuthr force-pushed the fix/lm-sector-status branch from a8e88e7 to 8aa9095 Compare March 12, 2024 13:08
@LexLuthr LexLuthr changed the base branch from release/v1.26.0 to master March 12, 2024 13:08
@snadrus snadrus merged commit 77dd1f5 into master Mar 12, 2024
90 checks passed
@snadrus snadrus deleted the fix/lm-sector-status branch March 12, 2024 16:02
rjan90 added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2024
* enable storing events (#11712)

* fix: commit batch: Always go through commit batcher (#11704)

* fix: commit batch: Always go through commit batcher

* fix sealing fsm tests

* sealing pipeline: Fix panic on padding pieces in WaitDeals (#11708)

* sealing pipeline: Fix panic on padding pieces in WaitDeals

* sealing pipeline: Catch panics

* sealing pipeline: Output DDO pieces in SectorStatus (#11709)

* sealing pipeline: Fix failing ProveCommit3 aggregate (#11710)

* itests: Repro failing ProveCommit3 aggregate

* commit batch: Correctly sort sectors in processBatchV2

* fix imports

* ci: Bigger instance for sector_pledge test

* itests: Use Must-Post mining in TestPledgeBatching

---------

Co-authored-by: Aarsh Shah <aarshkshah1992@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Łukasz Magiera <magik6k@users.noreply.github.com>
rjan90 added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2024
* enable storing events (#11712)

* fix: commit batch: Always go through commit batcher (#11704)

* fix: commit batch: Always go through commit batcher

* fix sealing fsm tests

* sealing pipeline: Fix panic on padding pieces in WaitDeals (#11708)

* sealing pipeline: Fix panic on padding pieces in WaitDeals

* sealing pipeline: Catch panics

* sealing pipeline: Output DDO pieces in SectorStatus (#11709)

* sealing pipeline: Fix failing ProveCommit3 aggregate (#11710)

* itests: Repro failing ProveCommit3 aggregate

* commit batch: Correctly sort sectors in processBatchV2

* fix imports

* ci: Bigger instance for sector_pledge test

* itests: Use Must-Post mining in TestPledgeBatching

---------

Co-authored-by: Aarsh Shah <aarshkshah1992@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Łukasz Magiera <magik6k@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants