TODO

vzkouset par veci na starem -anonymized-u a zjistit zda dava smysl porovnavat stary s novym
otazky napsat programovacim jazykem. Nejcastejsi je vyrabeni vyrazu (pouziti dokumentu atd.) a pak prichazi, pohyb v pravidle (zoom/pan/collapse/find invalid) a copy/paste (presun z vetve jinam) a delete
pokud stary -anonymized- dava smysl srovnavat:
- udelat stejne vstupni dokumenty
- udelat stejne operace?

TODO idea

ukolem bylo webovej prototyp, nikoliv zlepseni UX - to je jen evaluacni bonus

What people to pick?

Those that never used any version of -anonymized-. Trained people will hate on the new UI just because they are used to the old UI.
programmers. They will understand the concept.

How to prepare them?

tell them the concept, give them a list of useful features but let them find them on their own (copy paste, undo / redo). It is OK to tell them about the features, because ERAIN users get instruction videos anyway.

interpretation:

SUS should be taken by 15 people to be reliable. I will do it for 2 (simplified SUS).
calculate SUS score, see if -anonymized-2 has higher score than -anonymized-1
Bonus: compare times
Bonus: use Jeff Sauro's curve created from 500 SUS tests and see how many of those 500 are worse than ERAIN2 (percentile of goodness) src

Exercises

the number of execrises does not matter. What matters is that users try the stuff that -anonymized- is most usually used for / what it's intended for.