Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Channels, Feeds & Transactions Discussion group 16th Nov 2021 #504

Closed
12 of 14 tasks
kriswest opened this issue Nov 15, 2021 · 11 comments
Closed
12 of 14 tasks

Channels, Feeds & Transactions Discussion group 16th Nov 2021 #504

kriswest opened this issue Nov 15, 2021 · 11 comments
Labels
channels feeds & transactions Channels, Feeds & Transactions Discussion Group help wanted Extra attention is needed meeting

Comments

@kriswest
Copy link
Contributor

kriswest commented Nov 15, 2021

Group overview

There are currently 10 open issues in the FDC3 repository , under consideration for the 2.0 release, that relate to the existing concept of channels (both the 'system channels' used via the desktop agent API, and 'app channels' interacted with through the Channels API) and new concepts we've discussed introducing: transactions (a standardized way to make a request and receive a response back) and feeds (a standardized way to request a stream of data, such as a pricing stream).

Relevant issue tags

Current open issues that relate to the above concepts with the label:

Meeting Date

Thursday 16 Nov 2021 - 9am EST / 2pm GMT

WebEx info

  • Meeting Link
    Meeting number: 2558 477 5439
    Password: NhUsuwmR373

More ways to join

  • Join by video system:
  • Join by phone
    • +1-415-655-0003 US Toll
    • +44-20319-88141 UK Toll
  • Access code: 255 847 75439

Meeting notices

  • FINOS Project leads are responsible for observing the FINOS guidelines for running project meetings. Project maintainers can find additional resources in the FINOS Maintainers Cheatsheet.

  • All participants in FINOS project meetings are subject to the LF Antitrust Policy, the FINOS Community Code of Conduct and all other FINOS policies.

  • FINOS meetings involve participation by industry competitors, and it is the intention of FINOS and the Linux Foundation to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is therefore extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas, and be aware of, and not participate in, any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws. Please contact legal@finos.org with any questions.

  • FINOS project meetings may be recorded for use solely by the FINOS team for administration purposes. In very limited instances, and with explicit approval, recordings may be made more widely available.

  • A Discussion Group has no direct decision-making power regarding the FDC3 standard - rather it is intended that anything they propose or work on will result in proposals (via Github issues and PRs) for the Standards Working Group participants to consider and vote on for inclusion in the standard. As such, participation in a Discussion group is not required for contributing to any particular issue or FDC 2.0 as a whole.

Agenda

Minutes

  • Allow intents to be targeted at specific instances of apps #450
    • Consensus was achieved that future work should focus on proposal A
      • Meeting participants contributed that:
        • Users of the standard should be encouraged to pass metadata objects, returned to them by other API calls, in order to define targets (which allows for some variation of the metadata content between implementations).
        • Rather than introduce a new interface (that extends AppMetadata) to represent an instance of app, we could use an optional field on AppMetadata, that if set, indicates that the object represents an existing instance of an App. Introducing a new type may complicate the signature of API functions.
        • A Desktop agent may want or need to pass more information about an instance than just an id
          • For example, data might be passed to help identify the instance on the screen or provide a friendly name for the instance (in addition to a technical identifier for the instance).
        • There were obvious use-cases for interacting with an instance that you've previously interacted with, e.g. because you opened it (fdc3.open or fdc3.raiseIntent) - but they were unclear on use-cases for finding an existing instance. Such use-cases need to be re-articulated.
          • Other participants mentioned creating your own intent resolver within an app (the use-case for findIntent) or re-using an existing instance that a user launched manually or was otherwise already in the workspace, which they didn't want to duplicate with an additional instance (e.g. a price chart for general use).
          • Changes to raiseIntent/IntentResolution need to be addressed by the proposal
        • A two-step process, where functions like findIntent return only a single AppMetadata, with instances being returned by a findInstance API call are undesirable.
      • This discussion was particularly challenging to follow and future discussions should be centred on a proposal and proposed revisions to it to ensure that the discussion is easier to follow
        • Participants are encouraged to bring concrete proposals or counter-proposals to future meetings
  • Next meeting: Tuesday 30th Nov 9am GMT / 2pm EST

Action Items

Untracked attendees

Full name Affiliation GitHub username
@kriswest kriswest added help wanted Extra attention is needed meeting channels feeds & transactions Channels, Feeds & Transactions Discussion Group labels Nov 15, 2021
@Julia-Ritter
Copy link
Contributor

Julia / FINOS

@kriswest
Copy link
Contributor Author

🚀 Kris West / Cosaic

@MichaelMCoates
Copy link

Michael Coates / OpenFin

@bertrand-s
Copy link
Contributor

Bertrand / Symphony

@hampshan
Copy link

hampshan commented Nov 16, 2021

Andrew Hampshire @ UBS

@openfin-gavin
Copy link

Gavin Lauchlan / OpenFin

@pgn-vole
Copy link

Yacine Zalouani / UBS

@lspiro-Tick42
Copy link

Leslie Spiro / Glue42

@rikoe
Copy link
Contributor

rikoe commented Nov 16, 2021

Riko / Adaptive

@pbaize
Copy link

pbaize commented Nov 16, 2021

Pierre / OpenFin

@kriswest
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've posted what minutes I could. Please let me know (in comments) about any omissions or errors

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
channels feeds & transactions Channels, Feeds & Transactions Discussion Group help wanted Extra attention is needed meeting
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

10 participants