-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 132
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Context Data & Intents Discussion Group, 17 Feb 2022 #596
Labels
Context Data & Intents
Contexts & Intents Discussion Group
help wanted
Extra attention is needed
indexed
When a meeting attendance is being tracked
meeting
Comments
Julia / FINOS |
Reena Raichura / Glue42 |
Tiago / Cosaic |
Dom / IHS Markit |
Bertrand / Symphony |
Paul / Singletrack |
Kris West / Cosaic |
Adnane /Symphony |
Hugh / FactSet |
Johan /OpenFin 🎁 |
Nathan / FlexTrade |
Riko / Adaptive |
Jane @ FINOS here |
Andy Westacott / Citi |
Pierre Neu / Symphony |
Katherine Lachelin /Iress |
Closed
18 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Context Data & Intents
Contexts & Intents Discussion Group
help wanted
Extra attention is needed
indexed
When a meeting attendance is being tracked
meeting
Group overview
At the FDC3 Use Cases Roundtable London, October 5th 2021 participants agreed that the FDC3 lexicon needs to be expanded, both with additional intents and context types to support Use Cases, but also to include more primitive data types in order to construct complex types. A number of participants also agreed that now is an appropriate time to expand the Lexicon.
See #455 for full details of the meeting outcomes.
This group is being convened to discuss and arrange work to contribute further Context types and Intents to support Use Cases being implemented by participants.
Relevant issue tags
Current open issues that relate to the discussion group:
Issues will also be tagged with the labels:
Meeting Date
Thursday 17 Feb 2022 - 9am EST / 2pm GMT
WebEx info
Meeting number: 2556 495 5451
More ways to join
Meeting notices
FINOS Project leads are responsible for observing the FINOS guidelines for running project meetings. Project maintainers can find additional resources in the FINOS Maintainers Cheatsheet.
All participants in FINOS project meetings are subject to the LF Antitrust Policy, the FINOS Community Code of Conduct and all other FINOS policies.
FINOS meetings involve participation by industry competitors, and it is the intention of FINOS and the Linux Foundation to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is therefore extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas, and be aware of, and not participate in, any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws. Please contact legal@finos.org with any questions.
FINOS project meetings may be recorded for use solely by the FINOS team for administration purposes. In very limited instances, and with explicit approval, recordings may be made more widely available.
A Discussion Group has no direct decision-making power regarding the FDC3 standard - rather it is intended that anything they propose or work on will result in proposals (via Github issues and PRs) for the Standards Working Group participants to consider and vote on for inclusion in the standard. As such, participation in a Discussion group is not required for contributing to any particular issue or FDC 2.0 as a whole.
Agenda
Minutes
fdc3.ChatInit
type andSendChatMessage
intent. The group was generally in favour of these additions, and happy for it to proceed to PR and be proposed to the SWG.ChatRoomRef
return type, and the information contained therein, e.g.appName
. @kriswest pointed out that it may fit better with the existingAppMetadata
concept, which may need some API improvements to fully support this use case.RichTextBlock
proposal for messages was also well received and could add significant value to more use cases than just chat for FDC3, especially in the absence of existing standards for concise rich text transfer via JSON. @bertrand-s was asked to expand the issue with examples of JSON payloads with rich text.ViewOrganization
intent was well received, but there was consensus that aViewProfile
that applies to bothContact
andOrganization
would be even better. In this case,ViewContact
would be deprecated but not removed from the standard.ViewResearch
was equally well received and the group agreed to propose it for standardisation.ViewOrders
has more complexity and overlap of use cases and asset classes, so will stand over to the next meeting, along with undiscussed intent proposals from the agenda.Action Items
AppMetadata
#603ViewProfile
intent, deprecateViewContact
ViewResearch
intentThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: