15 Oct 2024 - AI Readiness Meeting Agenda

[ColinEberhardt]

Date

15 Oct 2024

Zoom details

The AI readiness group is currently members-only, with meeting details shared via a private email list. To join the group, please contact membersuccess@finos.org.

Meeting notices

• FINOS Project leads are responsible for observing the FINOS guidelines for running project meetings. Project maintainers can find additional resources in the FINOS Maintainers Cheatsheet.

• All participants in FINOS project meetings are subject to the LF Antitrust Policy, the FINOS Community Code of Conduct and all other FINOS policies.

• FINOS meetings involve participation by industry competitors, and it is the intention of FINOS and the Linux Foundation to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is therefore extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas, and be aware of, and not participate in, any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws. Please contact legal@finos.org with any questions.

• FINOS project meetings may be recorded for use solely by the FINOS team for administration purposes. In very limited instances, and with explicit approval, recordings may be made more widely available.

Agenda and minutes

• we kicked-off by discussing various tidy-up tasks
  • change meeting template to non chatham house
  • ensure meetings are all marked as open and same format
• we discussed marketing the newly public SIG
  • next week, newsletter regular (6 weekly), which will have an announcement @karlmoll @lucaborella89 to action
• @ColinEberhardt gave an overview of the current SIG activities and outputs
• @eddie-knight described how the AI SIG and CCC collaborated at the OSFF conference. The take-away is that AI SIG output is highly compatible with CCC.
  • A missing piece is the workflow, integrations points between CCC / Architecture as code, and various other related projects
  • @karlmoll is also considering a hypothesis about further collaboration and integration, including Waltz and Morphir
• There was further discussion about how we progress, potentially off-line sessions, creating a lightweight proposal
• now that we have moved public, we should re-consider the meeting schedules / what works well / what doesn't
  • @vicenteherrera suggested that a division between working meetings and open discussion, still makes a lot of sense
• Rimma outlined the workshops we held pre OSFF
  • one on finalising the governance framework
  • the other on the bigger roadmap / long-term focus / responsible AI (potentially a separate working group)
• Luca suggested to expand AI Readiness beyond risk and controls, now that we laid out the governance framework, towards Governance /Responsible AI
  • Andy reminded the group about the importance of clear deadline + in-person days (+ optionally external pressure e.g. regulatory environment EU AI Act like) to deliver in the open
  • Frederick mentioned accountability of the data, bias and fairness of the data, integration points, showing e.g. 1) how securing sensitive data can be incorporate, 2) how to "untrain" a model. Some use cases will be suggested

Luca to start a new issue for defining SIG roadmap

[ColinEberhardt]

@ColinEberhardt / Scott Logic

[vicenteherrera]

@vicenteherrera / Control Plane

[karlmoll]

Karl Moll / FINOS

[Perelmuter]

Rimma Perelmuter / FINOS

[fkautz]

Frederick Kautz - TestifySec Inc

[eddie-knight]

👋 Eddie Knight / Sonatype

[AmolMeshram19]

Amol Meshram/LSEG

[sublimino]

Andy Martin // @controlplaneio

[lionking421]

Prashant Jasani / Morgan Stanley.