Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

traversal node setup #176

Closed
dblanm opened this issue Sep 12, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

traversal node setup #176

dblanm opened this issue Sep 12, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@dblanm
Copy link

dblanm commented Sep 12, 2016

Since the last release of FCL 0.6.0 the traversal_node_setup.h has disappeared, which included the traversal_node_octree between others.
I cannot find anything related to the exact updates done by the 0.6.0 release.
Could anyone tell me which one is the similar header to traversal_node_setup.h? Since OMPLapp relies upon this header.

Thanks in advance!

Edit: using FCL 0.5.0 (while compiling OMPLapp) gives the following error

/usr/local/include/fcl/octree.h: In member function ‘fcl::OcTree::OcTreeNode* fcl::OcTree::getNodeChild(fcl::OcTree::OcTreeNode*, unsigned int)’:
/usr/local/include/fcl/octree.h:200:18: error: ‘fcl::OcTree::OcTreeNode’ has no member named ‘getChild’
     return node->getChild(childIdx);
                  ^
/usr/local/include/fcl/octree.h: In member function ‘const OcTreeNode* fcl::OcTree::getNodeChild(const OcTreeNode*, unsigned int) const’:
/usr/local/include/fcl/octree.h:210:18: error: ‘const OcTreeNode’ has no member named ‘getChild’
     return node->getChild(childIdx);

Does FCL still not support octomap 1.8.0? The compilation of FCL with octomap worked using #142

@jslee02
Copy link
Member

jslee02 commented Sep 23, 2016

You could use fcl.h that will be installed at the top level of the include directory. It includes all the necessary FCL headers so that you no longer need to try to figure out which FCL headers should be included for your use.

FCL 0.5 should support octomap 1.8.0 with #126 and #129, but I'll take a look at it.

@dblanm dblanm closed this as completed Feb 2, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants