From bffba76b52dfe96f42fb153c02824237968a15c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Samuel Tardieu Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 10:54:45 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix two typos in lint description --- clippy_lints/src/iter_without_into_iter.rs | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/clippy_lints/src/iter_without_into_iter.rs b/clippy_lints/src/iter_without_into_iter.rs index 43e1b92c9b9a7..abfc50369b5b6 100644 --- a/clippy_lints/src/iter_without_into_iter.rs +++ b/clippy_lints/src/iter_without_into_iter.rs @@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ declare_clippy_lint! { /// /// ### Why is this bad? /// It's not bad, but having them is idiomatic and allows the type to be used in iterator chains - /// by just calling `.iter()`, instead of the more awkward `<&Type>::into_iter` or `(&val).iter()` syntax - /// in case of ambiguity with another `Intoiterator` impl. + /// by just calling `.iter()`, instead of the more awkward `<&Type>::into_iter` or `(&val).into_iter()` syntax + /// in case of ambiguity with another `IntoIterator` impl. /// /// ### Example /// ```rust