Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(utils): improve usage of formly-utils #283

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 24, 2016
Merged

feat(utils): improve usage of formly-utils #283

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 24, 2016

Conversation

aitboudad
Copy link
Member

What kind of change does this PR introduce? feature

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Nov 24, 2016

Current coverage is 86.13% (diff: 85.93%)

Merging #283 into master will decrease coverage by 0.39%

@@             master       #283   diff @@
==========================================
  Files            18         18          
  Lines           646        642     -4   
  Methods         140        139     -1   
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches        151        152     +1   
==========================================
- Hits            559        553     -6   
- Misses           87         89     +2   
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last update 2da03a9...6574126

return;
}
for (let srcArg in src) {
if (this.isNullOrUndefined(dest[srcArg]) || this.isBlankString(dest[srcArg])) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How are the functions available in this keyword?

Copy link
Member Author

@aitboudad aitboudad Nov 24, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

removed this, I guess it refer to all exported methods

@mohammedzamakhan mohammedzamakhan merged commit 974b6d7 into ngx-formly:master Nov 24, 2016
@aitboudad aitboudad deleted the utils branch November 24, 2016 14:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants