From a10abba5a5691d54714ab5ae8e94beefa3d7a4fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Florian Rivoal Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 13:17:50 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] phrasing improvements Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr --- index.bs | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/index.bs b/index.bs index 506cc466..8cc3a744 100644 --- a/index.bs +++ b/index.bs @@ -2703,10 +2703,10 @@ Determining the W3C Decision
For example, to make [=substantive changes=] to a [=technical report=] - prior to publication as a [=Recommendation=] - it would need to go through a new [=Update Request=] - and be republished as a new [=Candidate Recommendation=], - and to fulfill the criteria for advancement. + prior to publication as a [=Recommendation=], + it would need to go through a new [=Update Request=], + be republished as a new [=Candidate Recommendation=], + and fulfill the criteria for advancement. Alternatively, the desired changes can be introduced as non-substantive amendments using the process for [[#revising-rec|revising a Recommendation]]. However, they cannot be directly integrated between [=PR=] and [=REC=],