You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The syntax highlighting is a bit lacking. When VSCode added syntax APIs, Ionide used that instead of Regex and it got so much better. Would it be possible to follow the work done here: emacs-csharp/csharp-mode#201 and use https://emacs-tree-sitter.github.io for more fine grained highlighting?
Expected behavior
Detailed syntax highlighting like Ionide in VSCode
Actual behavior
Too little of the code is highlighted, but it would be nice to get e.g. types, namespaces and members in different colors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
atlemann
changed the title
Could we add support for tree-sitter
Add support for tree-sitter syntax highlighting?
Jun 22, 2022
Hello! I was looking into this, and I came across this grammar. Does anyone know if it's at a stage where it can be used to implement a tree-sitter based major mode?
Hello! I was looking into this, and I came across this grammar. Does anyone know if it's at a stage where it can be used to implement a tree-sitter based major mode?
Description
The syntax highlighting is a bit lacking. When VSCode added syntax APIs, Ionide used that instead of Regex and it got so much better. Would it be possible to follow the work done here: emacs-csharp/csharp-mode#201 and use https://emacs-tree-sitter.github.io for more fine grained highlighting?
Expected behavior
Detailed syntax highlighting like Ionide in VSCode
Actual behavior
Too little of the code is highlighted, but it would be nice to get e.g. types, namespaces and members in different colors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: