You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I see that Rove has ASDF integration, which is great. But it seems that (as far as I could understand) it also requires that an ASDF definition exists in order for a test suite to run (except for individual tests, which can be run wirh run-test, but that is not thte same thing as running the full test suite).
It would be nice to add a paragraph to the README explaining that -- or even better, to have a function that will run a test suite without the need of an ASDF system with components having being defined beforehand.
(I know most real systems will use ASDF, but sometimes a testing framework is useful when you want to test a simple/small program for which you wouldn't bother using ASDF).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, currently rove:run is considered to be used with ASDF systems or ASDF package-inferred-system.
Perhaps, it's nice if rove:run allows to take a package-designator to run tests in it.
(I'll add it when I'm sure it's what you need)
Hello,
I see that Rove has ASDF integration, which is great. But it seems that (as far as I could understand) it also requires that an ASDF definition exists in order for a test suite to run (except for individual tests, which can be run wirh
run-test
, but that is not thte same thing as running the full test suite).It would be nice to add a paragraph to the README explaining that -- or even better, to have a function that will run a test suite without the need of an ASDF system with components having being defined beforehand.
(I know most real systems will use ASDF, but sometimes a testing framework is useful when you want to test a simple/small program for which you wouldn't bother using ASDF).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: