Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
Hey @HenrikBengtsson did you see this? I am hoping to get back to this soon. I am thinking that a batchtools_custom backend will work with some minor modifications. Do you see the Future API being of any use in this case? Also, could you please link to an example of a batchtools_custom implementation? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hey Henrik,
I work as a developer for CloudyCluster(http://gcp.cloudycluster.com/). Our product creates a scalable HPC cluster on AWS or GCP, where users can submit Slurm or PBS jobs. These jobs have regular #SBATCH and #PBS headers and are no different from a standard Slurm/PBS script. Our meta-scheduler(CCQ) reads the scripts, deploys worker nodes to run the jobs, then tears them down once the jobs have finished. Instead of
sbatch
orqsub
, you simply useccqsub
with any of the supported flags.Some of our customers use Futures with their traditional HPC clusters, and we want that functionality to be available to all of our users. I looked into integrating CCQ as a backend for a batchtools_custom plan and template file. Can you please offer advice on how to integrate a custom scheduler(that still uses Torque and Slurm headers) with Futures? I would like to determine the best path forward and required modifications to both products(CloudyCluster and this repo) before I proceed. I appreciate anything you or other members of the community have to offer.~Cole McKnight
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions