Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Central GA4GH Ticketing #2

Open
MKonopko opened this issue Jan 13, 2020 · 6 comments
Open

Central GA4GH Ticketing #2

MKonopko opened this issue Jan 13, 2020 · 6 comments

Comments

@MKonopko
Copy link
Contributor

Per M Haendel:

a place to put requests such as these. It would be terrific if there was a more coordinated suite of GitHub repos and a central ticketing/work tracking system across them for GA4GH. Please let us know if you want help or advice in setting up such a thing, we are happy to contribute.

@jb-adams
Copy link
Member

@MKonopko @mellybelly one way to track incoming requests would be through the GA4GH Organization-level Project boards on Github (link). We currently have boards for specific projects, but could potentially add a board for TASC and/or general GA4GH work.

@mellybelly
Copy link

I love the board :-)

@rishidev
Copy link
Collaborator

Defer until technical team is in place 2021 if this is feasible.

@uniqueg
Copy link

uniqueg commented Dec 29, 2022

I just wanted to bump this and say that I 100% agree that GA4GH should offer a centralized entry point for raising issues/tickets. In my opinion, it would be crucially important especially for newcomers and one-off or casual contributors , but also for regular contributors (as it is, I only found out today that in fact there is a TASC repo and project board).

I could imagine a publicly available open (i.e., no auth) service with a form that people can fill in issues. It could provide checklists for work streams and individual specs/standards that submitters could optionally make use of. This info could then be used to automatically create issues, via the GitHub API, in the appropriate repos for further manual triaging by WS and API/standard champions. Issues that do not have any info to allow us to identify a suitable repository would end up in some dummy repo and would need to be manually triaged and transferred to an appropriate place.

Ideally, the service could also make use of the GitHub API to list all available issues for people to search through before filing an issue (or, ideally, suggest related issues) to avoid duplicates. But that may be a second step. Although perhaps the whole service could be a Google Summer of Code project.

@uniqueg
Copy link

uniqueg commented Dec 29, 2022

@mellybelly
Copy link

I couldn't agree more about the importance of a one-stop shop for anyone to submit a ticket (and have it delivered to the correct team) as well as the inventory of standards and their associated repos/ticketing systems (i.e. #7). Overall, we continue to have very many different places to work, making coordination across them challenging.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants