Reduce measure errors #3
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
thank you |
|
Yup. I found it by chance while looking at wiring_pulse.c, to check if it used interrupts... |
gamegine
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 6, 2019
pulseIn works better in noInterrupts() thank to NdK73
gamegine
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2019
pulseIn works better in noInterrupts() thank to NdK73
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
According to docs, pulseIn works better in noInterrupts() mode, so I added a critical section.
The float division is kept outside on purpose (it's slow and can run with interrupts enabled).
Moreover, there was an obvious copy-paste error in header file.
Hope it helps.