Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add support for sriov network interfaces #37

Open
stoyanr opened this issue Sep 4, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Add support for sriov network interfaces #37

stoyanr opened this issue Sep 4, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
area/networking Networking related area/performance Performance (across all domains, such as control plane, networking, storage, etc.) related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension lifecycle/rotten Nobody worked on this for 12 months (final aging stage) platform/kubevirt Container Native Virtualization (CNV) KubeVirt platform/infrastructure priority/5 Priority (lower number equals higher priority)

Comments

@stoyanr
Copy link
Contributor

stoyanr commented Sep 4, 2020

Currently, the pod network and any Multus networks added to VMs always use the bridge interface. This is a good default, however we have concerns regarding potential issues with its performance. Therefore, we should research adding support for the sriov interface.

We should only do this if we have tested the network performance and identified actual performance issues with the bridge interface.

/area performance
/area networking
/kind enhancement
/priority nonessential
/platform kubevirt
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added area/networking Networking related area/performance Performance (across all domains, such as control plane, networking, storage, etc.) related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension platform/kubevirt Container Native Virtualization (CNV) KubeVirt platform/infrastructure priority/nonessential labels Sep 4, 2020
@stoyanr
Copy link
Contributor Author

stoyanr commented Sep 4, 2020

/cc @mfranczy Feel free to add your ideas and comments

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the lifecycle/stale Nobody worked on this for 6 months (will further age) label Nov 4, 2020
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added priority/5 Priority (lower number equals higher priority) and removed priority/nonessential labels Mar 8, 2021
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added lifecycle/rotten Nobody worked on this for 12 months (final aging stage) and removed lifecycle/stale Nobody worked on this for 6 months (will further age) labels Sep 22, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/networking Networking related area/performance Performance (across all domains, such as control plane, networking, storage, etc.) related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension lifecycle/rotten Nobody worked on this for 12 months (final aging stage) platform/kubevirt Container Native Virtualization (CNV) KubeVirt platform/infrastructure priority/5 Priority (lower number equals higher priority)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@stoyanr @gardener-robot