Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Adapt the deployment priorityClassName according to the gardener documentation #192

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2022
Merged

Adapt the deployment priorityClassName according to the gardener documentation #192

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2022

Conversation

krgostev
Copy link

@krgostev krgostev commented Jul 6, 2022 •
edited
Loading

How to categorize this PR?

/area networking
/kind enhancement

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR removes the old PriorityClass from the charts and adapt the deployment priorityClassName according to the gardener documentation. Part of #5634
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

This version of gardener-extension-networking-calico requires Gardener v1.50+.

@krgostev krgostev requested review from a team as code owners July 6, 2022 10:44
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added area/networking Networking related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension needs/review Needs review size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Jul 6, 2022
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jul 6, 2022
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jul 6, 2022
@krgostev krgostev mentioned this pull request Jul 6, 2022
Closed
35 tasks
@krgostev krgostev changed the title Adapt the deployment priorityClassName according to the gardener docu… Adapt the deployment priorityClassName according to the gardener documentation Jul 6, 2022
DockToFuture
DockToFuture approved these changes Jul 11, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@DockToFuture DockToFuture left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging and removed needs/review Needs review labels Jul 11, 2022
@DockToFuture DockToFuture merged commit 3e189e3 into gardener:master Jul 11, 2022
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged) label Jul 11, 2022
@DockToFuture DockToFuture mentioned this pull request Jul 11, 2022
Merged
@krgostev krgostev deleted the priorityclass branch July 15, 2022 10:07
@ialidzhikov ialidzhikov mentioned this pull request Aug 16, 2022
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@DockToFuture DockToFuture DockToFuture approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/networking Networking related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@krgostev @DockToFuture @gardener-robot-ci-1 @gardener-robot-ci-3 @gardener-robot