Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Adapt the priority according to the gardener guideline #533

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 13, 2022
Merged

Adapt the priority according to the gardener guideline #533

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 13, 2022

Conversation

krgostev
Copy link
Contributor

@krgostev krgostev commented Jul 7, 2022

How to categorize this PR?

/area quality
/kind enhancement
/platform azure

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR removes the old PriorityClass from the charts and adapt the deployment priorityClassName according to the gardener documentation. Part of #5634
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

This version of provider-azure requires Gardener v1.50+.

@krgostev krgostev requested review from a team as code owners July 7, 2022 07:37
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added area/quality Output qualification (tests, checks, scans, automation in general, etc.) related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension platform/azure Microsoft Azure platform/infrastructure needs/review Needs review size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Jul 7, 2022
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jul 7, 2022
@krgostev krgostev mentioned this pull request Jul 7, 2022
Closed
35 tasks
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jul 7, 2022
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jul 7, 2022
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jul 7, 2022
kon-angelo
kon-angelo approved these changes Jul 13, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@kon-angelo kon-angelo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging and removed needs/review Needs review labels Jul 13, 2022
@kon-angelo kon-angelo merged commit 860ff42 into gardener:master Jul 13, 2022
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged) label Jul 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@kon-angelo kon-angelo kon-angelo approved these changes

@dkistner dkistner dkistner approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/quality Output qualification (tests, checks, scans, automation in general, etc.) related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) platform/azure Microsoft Azure platform/infrastructure reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
7 participants
@krgostev @dkistner @kon-angelo @gardener-robot-ci-1 @gardener-robot-ci-2 @gardener-robot-ci-3 @gardener-robot