-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Organism groups #16
Comments
@kcopas In Section 2.2, after the sentence, "The freshwater amendments include general fields describing the site where the observation was made, such as the water body name, a description of the location and the elevation (Table 7).", please add the following text: "The organism group should be included for all GBIF data classes (link to section on data classes). This information is not currently captured in existing DwC terms. It is recommended that the term freshwaterOrganismGroup be defined in a freshwater extension of DwC so that it can be a searchable term in GBIF (link to section 3.1.1), but until the creation of that extension, this information should be included in the dynamicProperties term (e.g., as organism group:fish)." |
Change made |
Feedback for: https://docs.gbif-uat.org/freshwater-data-publishing-guide/en/#organism-groups
Please provide examples how organism groups should be shared with GBIF by providing specific fields in which the data can be shared.
It is unclear from the paragraph whether such data can be shared for all dataset classes, which I do not think is currently possible.
This statement sound like the information should be added at occurrence record level, however, there is currently no dwc/gbif term that can be used to add such data. I realise that there is a proposal for an extension to capture the currently uncapturable data, but I don't think the need for many of these terms are freshwater specific (for example biome).
@ManonGros may have further comments
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: