Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Possesive suffixes in south saami nouns (Bugzilla Bug 2650) #60

Open
albbas opened this issue Mar 11, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Possesive suffixes in south saami nouns (Bugzilla Bug 2650) #60

albbas opened this issue Mar 11, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working low priority

Comments

@albbas
Copy link
Contributor

albbas commented Mar 11, 2020

This issue was created automatically with bugzilla2github

Bugzilla Bug 2650

Date: 2020-03-11T14:45:03+01:00
From: Børre Gaup <<borre.gaup>>
To: Sjur Nørstebø Moshagen <<sjur.n.moshagen>>
CC: borre.gaup, lene.antonsen, maja.l.kappfjell, siri.k.kappfjell, sjur.n.moshagen, sma064, thomas.omma, trond.trosterud

Last updated: 2020-03-12T09:22:33+01:00

@albbas
Copy link
Contributor Author

albbas commented Mar 11, 2020

Comment 13848

Date: 2020-03-11 14:45:03 +0100
From: Børre Gaup <<borre.gaup>>

Giellagáldu noticed that most nouns may have possessive suffixes, and are of the opinion that only a minority of nouns should have this possibility.

@albbas
Copy link
Contributor Author

albbas commented Mar 11, 2020

Comment 13849

Date: 2020-03-11 16:04:15 +0100
From: Børre Gaup <<borre.gaup>>

An example of what was considered as a lemma that shouldn't possessive suffixes:
http://gtweb.uit.no/cgi-bin/smi/smi.cgi?text=gueliejaevrie&pos=N&mode=full&action=paradigm&lang=sma&plang=sme

@albbas
Copy link
Contributor Author

albbas commented Mar 12, 2020

Comment 13850

Date: 2020-03-12 09:22:33 +0100
From: Lene Antonsen <<lene.antonsen>>

Man bør se på bruken av Px i korpuset. Her er alle substantiver med Px i følge vår analysator:
http://gtweb.uit.no/korp/?mode=sma#?lang=se&stats_reduce=word&cqp=%5Bmsd%20_%3D%20%22Px%22%20%26%20pos%20%3D%20%22N%22%5D&search_tab=1&hpp=1000&sort=keyword&search=cqp

Her er det en del ord som ikke er Px, men som skulle hatt en annen analyse, dvs at de i realiteten er missing, f.eks. frijjevaalteme. Jeg forslår å først legge disse til i lexc, det er bra for korpusanalysen.

Her er lista over ord, unifisert og med deskriptiv analyse
main/langs/sma/src/morphology/incoming/Px_korp_120320.txt

Når det gjelder bruk av Px til substantiver, må man også se på andre tekster enn de vi har i Korp, men det er ihvertfall første steg.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working low priority
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant