Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Design] Post-Bounty Completion Flow [Funder] #1152

Closed
vs77bb opened this issue May 11, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

[Design] Post-Bounty Completion Flow [Funder] #1152

vs77bb opened this issue May 11, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@vs77bb
Copy link
Contributor

vs77bb commented May 11, 2018

Needs Review (@PixelantDesign)

User Story

comment: # As a funder, I want to have a method to provide feedback on my experience so that Gitcoin's platform can improve and I can provide feedback (and potentially tips to Gitcoin developers.

Why Is this Needed?

Summary: An improvement upon the e-mail from @owocki which a) solicits feedback and b) provides an option for post-bounty tipping (an incentive technique to bring into the flow).

Description

Type: Feature

Current Behavior

comment: # Email from @owocki

Expected Behavior

comment: # In-line email from Gitcoin

Additional Information

Child of #1136

@PixelantDesign
Copy link
Contributor

there is an open ticket for this which is @mbeacom was looking into delighted

@mbeacom
Copy link
Contributor

mbeacom commented Jul 6, 2018

We can add a poll or survey following bounty completion via Hotjar to address this if we're so inclined.

@PixelantDesign
Copy link
Contributor

yes! a survey would be great! Are you able to send me an example survey from hotjar @mbeacom? Want to see how much we can customize. One thing I wondered is, do people respond to the current emails because they feel personal.

@vs77bb
Copy link
Contributor Author

vs77bb commented Sep 25, 2018

Dup of our #1490

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants