Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[GHSA-cqmj-92xf-r6r9] Insufficient validation when decoding a Socket.IO packet #4624

Conversation

darrachequesne
Copy link

Updates

  • Affected products
  • Description

Comments
The fix was backported in branch 3.3.x and released in version 3.3.4.

@github
Copy link
Collaborator

github commented Jul 22, 2024

Hi there @darrachequesne! A community member has suggested an improvement to your security advisory. If approved, this change will affect the global advisory listed at github.com/advisories. It will not affect the version listed in your project repository.

This change will be reviewed by our Security Curation Team. If you have thoughts or feedback, please share them in a comment here! If this PR has already been closed, you can start a new community contribution for this advisory

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the base branch from main to darrachequesne/advisory-improvement-4624 July 22, 2024 09:13
@advisory-database advisory-database bot merged commit 1219910 into darrachequesne/advisory-improvement-4624 Jul 22, 2024
2 checks passed
@advisory-database
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @darrachequesne! Thank you so much for contributing to the GitHub Advisory Database. This database is free, open, and accessible to all, and it's people like you who make it great. Thanks for choosing to help others. We hope you send in more contributions in the future!

@advisory-database advisory-database bot deleted the darrachequesne-GHSA-cqmj-92xf-r6r9 branch July 22, 2024 20:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants