Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

RDF schemas #20

Open
arademaker opened this issue May 25, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

RDF schemas #20

arademaker opened this issue May 25, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees
@arademaker
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@arademaker
Copy link
Member

Can we have more than one RDF schema? The schema adopted by http://openwordnet-pt.org precedes the W3C OntoLex Model being based on https://www.w3.org/TR/wordnet-rdf/. We have the schema specification and we are also developing a https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/ validation.
@jmccrae
Copy link
Member

jmccrae commented May 25, 2020

I certainly have no objection to this, as long as we ensure that the documentation is also written for this format.

@arademaker
Copy link
Member Author

Good, we must decide the structure of the documentation to specific what all formats must provide.

@jmccrae jmccrae mentioned this issue Sep 2, 2020
Closed
@arademaker arademaker self-assigned this Sep 3, 2020
@jmccrae
Copy link
Member

jmccrae commented Apr 20, 2021

I think this closed by the release of v1.1. @arademaker can you confirm (by closing this issue) or expand on what we still need?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@arademaker arademaker

Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@arademaker @jmccrae