Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Get rules by id when editing branch protection rule (#22932)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
When users rename an existing branch protection rule, a new rule with
the new name will be created and the old rule will still exist.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15528715/219276442-d3c001ad-e693-44ec-9ad2-b33f2666b49b.png)

---

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15528715/219276478-547c3b93-b3f1-4292-a1ef-c1b7747fe1bb.png)

The reason is that the `SettingsProtectedBranchPost` function only get
branch protection rule by name before updating or creating a rule. When
the rule name changes, the function cannot find the existing rule so it
will create a new rule rather than update the existing rule. To fix the
bug, the function should get rule by id first.

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
  • Loading branch information
Zettat123 and lunny authored Feb 20, 2023
1 parent 3596df5 commit 9a83aa2
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 32 additions and 4 deletions.
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2152,6 +2152,7 @@ settings.choose_branch = Choose a branch…
settings.no_protected_branch = There are no protected branches.
settings.edit_protected_branch = Edit
settings.protected_branch_required_rule_name = Required rule name
settings.protected_branch_duplicate_rule_name = Duplicate rule name
settings.protected_branch_required_approvals_min = Required approvals cannot be negative.
settings.tags = Tags
settings.tags.protection = Tag Protection
Expand Down
34 changes: 30 additions & 4 deletions routers/web/repo/setting_protected_branch.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -166,10 +166,36 @@ func SettingsProtectedBranchPost(ctx *context.Context) {
}

var err error
protectBranch, err = git_model.GetProtectedBranchRuleByName(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID, f.RuleName)
if err != nil {
ctx.ServerError("GetProtectBranchOfRepoByName", err)
return
if f.RuleID > 0 {
// If the RuleID isn't 0, it must be an edit operation. So we get rule by id.
protectBranch, err = git_model.GetProtectedBranchRuleByID(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID, f.RuleID)
if err != nil {
ctx.ServerError("GetProtectBranchOfRepoByID", err)
return
}
if protectBranch != nil && protectBranch.RuleName != f.RuleName {
// RuleName changed. We need to check if there is a rule with the same name.
// If a rule with the same name exists, an error should be returned.
sameNameProtectBranch, err := git_model.GetProtectedBranchRuleByName(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID, f.RuleName)
if err != nil {
ctx.ServerError("GetProtectBranchOfRepoByName", err)
return
}
if sameNameProtectBranch != nil {
ctx.Flash.Error(ctx.Tr("repo.settings.protected_branch_duplicate_rule_name"))
ctx.Redirect(fmt.Sprintf("%s/settings/branches/edit?rule_name=%s", ctx.Repo.RepoLink, protectBranch.RuleName))
return
}
}
} else {
// FIXME: If a new ProtectBranch has a duplicate RuleName, an error should be returned.
// Currently, if a new ProtectBranch with a duplicate RuleName is created, the existing ProtectBranch will be updated.
// But we cannot modify this logic now because many unit tests rely on it.
protectBranch, err = git_model.GetProtectedBranchRuleByName(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID, f.RuleName)
if err != nil {
ctx.ServerError("GetProtectBranchOfRepoByName", err)
return
}
}
if protectBranch == nil {
// No options found, create defaults.
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions services/forms/repo_form.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ func (f *RepoSettingForm) Validate(req *http.Request, errs binding.Errors) bindi
// ProtectBranchForm form for changing protected branch settings
type ProtectBranchForm struct {
RuleName string `binding:"Required"`
RuleID int64
EnablePush string
WhitelistUsers string
WhitelistTeams string
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 9a83aa2

Please sign in to comment.