You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Oops seems like the template is totally disregarded, so I will just put in some ad-hoc info here.
Description
The title speaks itself. This is prominent in the case of OpenStack Swift, prior to 2.11.0, does not implement chunked upload properly and just let the data passthrough, causing a corruption in the object store side.
This issue can be remediated by testing for the compatibility of this specific feature by uploading a big chunk of zeroed data (whatever it is) and retrieving it and see if it is still all zeroes. Also remember it should be tested per defined storage type because not everyone might use the same S3 endpoint. This is just a one-off test from startup so I wouldn't say the API call would be very high.
Well..although the more obvious answer is that QNAP should move on from an ancient version of OpenShift Swift (they are using 1.11.0)
Environment
Gitea Version: 1.18.0-rc0
From your first screenshot it looks like QuObjects saved the chunked upload into the file without removing the chunk parts. Maybe you can configure something to allow chunked uploads? Otherwise I don't know if we can help you.
edit: Looks like you found the problem.
If you can compile Gitea you may try this (minio.go):
Oops seems like the template is totally disregarded, so I will just put in some ad-hoc info here.
Description
The title speaks itself. This is prominent in the case of OpenStack Swift, prior to 2.11.0, does not implement chunked upload properly and just let the data passthrough, causing a corruption in the object store side.
This issue can be remediated by testing for the compatibility of this specific feature by uploading a big chunk of zeroed data (whatever it is) and retrieving it and see if it is still all zeroes. Also remember it should be tested per defined storage type because not everyone might use the same S3 endpoint. This is just a one-off test from startup so I wouldn't say the API call would be very high.
Well..although the more obvious answer is that QNAP should move on from an ancient version of OpenShift Swift (they are using 1.11.0)
Environment
Originally posted by @KN4CK3R in #21320 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: