Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Harbor as a pull cache and private registry #6863

Closed
rbkaspr opened this issue Jan 30, 2019 · 8 comments
Closed

Harbor as a pull cache and private registry #6863

rbkaspr opened this issue Jan 30, 2019 · 8 comments
Labels
kind/requirement New feature or idea on top of harbor

Comments

@rbkaspr
Copy link

rbkaspr commented Jan 30, 2019

We're looking to use Harbor as a private registry and would like it to also serve as a pull-through cache for the official Docker registry.
This feature is desirable for our use case because our Kubernetes cluster nodes have limited public ingress/egress points, and we'd like to be able to cache official Docker images locally to reduce the load on our public network devices, while still maintaining the ability to push our custom images to the same Harbor instance from our CI environment.

@wy65701436 wy65701436 added request/feature kind/requirement New feature or idea on top of harbor and removed request/feature labels Jan 30, 2019
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 1, 2019

Hi @rbkaspr – there's a proposal to enable this functionality defined here. So coming soon. 😄

Please let us know if you want to help, including testing the feature as we get closer to developing it.

@rbkaspr
Copy link
Author

rbkaspr commented Feb 3, 2019

@clouderati I'd be happy to help any way I can with this feature, especially testing. I don't have any substantial Go experience, but I have a couple high-level thoughts about how this could be implemented based on your current deployment model(unless you already have an implementation in mind).

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 9, 2019

Testing is super helpful! I'll ping you when the feature gets closer to release and perhaps you can give it a whirl and share your 2¢. 😄 Thanks!

@ghost ghost added request/feature and removed kind/requirement New feature or idea on top of harbor labels Feb 9, 2019
@rbkaspr
Copy link
Author

rbkaspr commented Feb 11, 2019

Awesome! Looking forward to hearing more and trying it out once it's ready 😄

@reasonerjt reasonerjt added kind/requirement New feature or idea on top of harbor and removed request/feature labels Apr 3, 2019
@michmike michmike added this to Backlog in Harbor Project Board Apr 24, 2019
@ordinarygulp
Copy link

I really like this idea! any progress?

@cedvan
Copy link

cedvan commented Aug 9, 2019

duplicate with #6894 ?

@xaleeks
Copy link
Contributor

xaleeks commented Aug 9, 2019

#8082

@xaleeks
Copy link
Contributor

xaleeks commented Aug 9, 2019

I'm closing this please refer to 8082 above

@xaleeks xaleeks closed this as completed Aug 9, 2019
Harbor Project Board automation moved this from Backlog to Completed Aug 9, 2019
@xaleeks xaleeks moved this from Completed to deprecated / duplicate / pre-existing in Harbor Project Board May 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/requirement New feature or idea on top of harbor
Projects
Harbor Project Board
  
deprecated / duplicate / pre-existing
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants