Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gopls: automated issue report (crash) - assertion failure in range statement checking logic #3483

Closed
zhiwenweb3 opened this issue Aug 8, 2024 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@zhiwenweb3
Copy link

gopls version: v0.16.1/go1.22.5
gopls flags:
update flags: proxy
extension version: 0.42.0
environment: Visual Studio Code darwin
initialization error: undefined
issue timestamp: Thu, 08 Aug 2024 11:06:29 GMT
restart history:
Thu, 08 Aug 2024 11:06:26 GMT: activation (enabled: true)

ATTENTION: PLEASE PROVIDE THE DETAILS REQUESTED BELOW.

Describe what you observed.

panic:   stmt.go:932: assertion failed

goroutine 4771 [running]:
go/types.(*Checker).handleBailout(0x14005bf4200, 0x14004f3f878)
	  check.go:367  0x9c
panic({0x102d0b3a0%3F, 0x14003f8c480%3F})
	  panic.go:770  0x124
go/types.assert(0x0%3F)
	  errors.go:28  0x60
go/types.(*Checker).rangeStmt(0x14005bf4200, 0x3, 0x1400323ad20)
	  stmt.go:932  0xb58
go/types.(*Checker).stmt(0x14005bf4200, 0x3, {0x102e94e80, 0x1400323ad20})
	  stmt.go:827  0x874
go/types.(*Checker).stmtList(0x14005bf4200, 0x3, {0x14002261290%3F, 0x10298c115%3F, 0x5%3F})
	  stmt.go:121  0x88
go/types.(*Checker).stmt(0x14005bf4200, 0x3, {0x102e94e20, 0x140038de9f0})
	  stmt.go:562  0x1974
go/types.(*Checker).rangeStmt(0x14005bf4200, 0x3, 0x1400323ad80)
	  stmt.go:993  0x570
go/types.(*Checker).stmt(0x14005bf4200, 0x0, {0x102e94e80, 0x1400323ad80})
	  stmt.go:827  0x874
go/types.(*Checker).stmtList(0x14005bf4200, 0x0, {0x14000526900%3F, 0x0%3F, 0x140004b8758%3F})
	  stmt.go:121  0x88
go/types.(*Checker).funcBody(0x14005bf4200, 0x102e92588%3F, {0x140004b8930%3F, 0x140000dc380%3F}, 0x14002832d00, 0x140038dea20, {0x0%3F, 0x0%3F})
	  stmt.go:41  0x21c
go/types.(*Checker).funcDecl.func1()
	  decl.go:852  0x44
go/types.(*Checker).processDelayed(0x14005bf4200, 0x0)
	  check.go:467  0x12c
go/types.(*Checker).checkFiles(0x14005bf4200, {0x14000d85f50, 0x2, 0x2})
	  check.go:411  0x188
go/types.(*Checker).Files(...)
	  check.go:372
golang.org/x/tools/gopls/internal/cache.(*typeCheckBatch).checkPackage(0x14005d403c0, {0x102e96168, 0x1400141e960}, 0x14004a68000)
	  check.go:1543  0x788
golang.org/x/tools/gopls/internal/cache.(*typeCheckBatch).handleSyntaxPackage(0x14005d403c0, {0x102e96168, 0x1400141e960}, 0x0, {0x140009e4f48, 0x16})
	  check.go:568  0x534
golang.org/x/tools/gopls/internal/cache.(*Snapshot).forEachPackageInternal.func2()
	  check.go:418  0x34
golang.org/x/sync/errgroup.(*Group).Go.func1()
	  errgroup.go:78  0x58
created by golang.org/x/sync/errgroup.(*Group).Go in goroutine 81
	  errgroup.go:75  0x98
gopls stats -anon gopls stats -anon failed after 1337 ms. Please check if gopls is killed by OS.

OPTIONAL: If you would like to share more information, you can attach your complete gopls logs.

NOTE: THESE MAY CONTAIN SENSITIVE INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR CODEBASE.
DO NOT SHARE LOGS IF YOU ARE WORKING IN A PRIVATE REPOSITORY.

<OPTIONAL: ATTACH LOGS HERE>

@gopherbot gopherbot added this to the Untriaged milestone Aug 8, 2024
@hyangah
Copy link
Contributor

hyangah commented Aug 8, 2024

Dup of golang/go#68334

Looks like the fix will be available in go1.22.6 and go1.23.0.
go1.22.6 was released recently. @zhiwenweb3 can you please update go to go1.22.6 and rebuild gopls?
Thanks!

@hyangah hyangah closed this as completed Aug 8, 2024
@hyangah hyangah changed the title gopls: automated issue report (crash) gopls: automated issue report (crash) - assertion failure in range statement checking logic Aug 8, 2024
@zhiwenweb3
Copy link
Author

Dup of golang/go#68334

Looks like the fix will be available in go1.22.6 and go1.23.0. go1.22.6 was released recently. @zhiwenweb3 can you please update go to go1.22.6 and rebuild gopls? Thanks!

ok i will do it, thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants