Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x/vulndb: potential Go vuln in github.com/portainer/portainer: CVE-2018-19466 #2218

Closed
tatianab opened this issue Nov 8, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
excluded: LEGACY_FALSE_POSITIVE (DO NOT USE) Vulnerability marked as false positive before we introduced the triage process

Comments

@tatianab
Copy link
Contributor

tatianab commented Nov 8, 2023

CVE-2018-19466 references github.com/portainer/portainer, which may be a Go module.

Description:
A vulnerability was found in Portainer before 1.20.0. Portainer stores LDAP credentials, corresponding to a master password, in cleartext and allows their retrieval via API calls.

References:

Cross references:
No existing reports found with this module or alias.

See doc/triage.md for instructions on how to triage this report.

modules:
    - module: github.com/portainer/portainer
      vulnerable_at: 0.10.1
      packages:
        - package: n/a
cves:
    - CVE-2018-19466
references:
    - fix: https://github.com/portainer/portainer/pull/2488
    - web: https://github.com/portainer/portainer/releases
    - web: https://github.com/MauroEldritch/lempo

@tatianab tatianab added the excluded: LEGACY_FALSE_POSITIVE (DO NOT USE) Vulnerability marked as false positive before we introduced the triage process label Nov 8, 2023
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/540721 mentions this issue: data/excluded: batch add 135 excluded reports

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
excluded: LEGACY_FALSE_POSITIVE (DO NOT USE) Vulnerability marked as false positive before we introduced the triage process
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants