Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x/vulndb: potential Go vuln in github.com/docker/docker: GHSA-xmmx-7jpf-fx42 #2914

Closed
GoVulnBot opened this issue Jun 10, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@GoVulnBot
Copy link

In GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-xmmx-7jpf-fx42, there is a vulnerability in the following Go packages or modules:

Unit Fixed Vulnerable Ranges
github.com/docker/docker 20.10.11 < 20.10.11

Cross references:

See doc/triage.md for instructions on how to triage this report.

id: GO-ID-PENDING
modules:
    - module: github.com/docker/docker
      versions:
        - fixed: 20.10.11+incompatible
      vulnerable_at: 20.10.10+incompatible
      packages:
        - package: github.com/docker/docker
summary: Moby (Docker Engine) is vulnerable to Ambiguous OCI manifest parsing in github.com/docker/docker
ghsas:
    - GHSA-xmmx-7jpf-fx42
references:
    - advisory: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-xmmx-7jpf-fx42
    - advisory: https://github.com/moby/moby/security/advisories/GHSA-xmmx-7jpf-fx42
source:
    id: GHSA-xmmx-7jpf-fx42
    created: 2024-06-10T20:01:59.195913616Z
review_status: UNREVIEWED

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/592456 mentions this issue: data/reports: add 19 unreviewed reports

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/592457 mentions this issue: data/reports: add 16 unreviewed reports

@tatianab tatianab self-assigned this Jul 1, 2024
@tatianab tatianab reopened this Jul 1, 2024
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/595999 mentions this issue: data/reports: review 7 reports

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants