Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x/vulndb: potential Go vuln in github.com/cosmos/gaia: GHSA-83qr-9v2h-qxp4 #3068

Closed
GoVulnBot opened this issue Aug 14, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@GoVulnBot
Copy link

Advisory GHSA-83qr-9v2h-qxp4 references a vulnerability in the following Go modules:

Module
github.com/cosmos/gaia

Description:

Summary

An issue was identified in the Interchain Security (ICS) module that could result in the slashing of a validator for an "old" equivocation. The height-base filter for consumer equivocation evidence introduced in v2.4.0-lsm was re-enabled.

Details

ICS v2.4.0-lsm introduced a height-base filter for consumer equivocation evidence. This feature enables a provider to set per consumer chain minimum heights for which cryptographic evid...

References:

No existing reports found with this module or alias.
See doc/quickstart.md for instructions on how to triage this report.

id: GO-ID-PENDING
modules:
    - module: github.com/cosmos/gaia
      non_go_versions:
        - introduced: TODO (earliest fixed "17.3.0", vuln range "> 14.2.0, < 17.3.0")
      vulnerable_at: 1.0.0
summary: |-
    Cosmos Hub (Gaia): The check for the height of cryptographic equivocation
    evidence is missing in github.com/cosmos/gaia
ghsas:
    - GHSA-83qr-9v2h-qxp4
references:
    - advisory: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-83qr-9v2h-qxp4
    - advisory: https://github.com/cosmos/gaia/security/advisories/GHSA-83qr-9v2h-qxp4
source:
    id: GHSA-83qr-9v2h-qxp4
    created: 2024-08-14T18:01:19.457919808Z
review_status: UNREVIEWED

@tatianab tatianab self-assigned this Aug 19, 2024
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/606775 mentions this issue: data/reports: add 4 reports

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants