You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is it possible to use or modify this code to do double stochastic integrals in a reasonable way, in order to support higher order SDE solvers? I am using your BrownianTree implementation with my own custom solvers right now and would like to try a higher order solver.
Thank you,
Katherine Crowson
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now torchsde is capable of providing both Davie and Davie-Foster approximations to Levy area (which is the double stochastic integral that usually matters). This can be done with e.g. BrownianInterval(..., levy_area_approximation="foster").
You can then access this at call-time by doing bm(..., return_A=True).
Note that this isn't the usual Wiktorrson approximation. That is typically used to give higher-order strong convergence, but is quite computationally expensive. The Davie[-Foster] approximations instead only give higher-order Wasserstein convergence, but are computationally much cheaper.
Let me know if you need more details. This topic is a bit of a can of worms, and the mathematics is not well-documented either here or in the academic literature.
Is it possible to use or modify this code to do double stochastic integrals in a reasonable way, in order to support higher order SDE solvers? I am using your BrownianTree implementation with my own custom solvers right now and would like to try a higher order solver.
Thank you,
Katherine Crowson
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: