Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

maven udpate fail due to LICENSE.txt rename to LICENSE #7831

Closed
haha4github opened this issue Feb 18, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #7849
Closed

maven udpate fail due to LICENSE.txt rename to LICENSE #7831

haha4github opened this issue Feb 18, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #7849

Comments

@haha4github
Copy link

haha4github commented Feb 18, 2023

Hi, my maven update failed and throw exception:

Caused by: java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: java.lang.RuntimeException: Failed to fetch license for com_google_flatbuffers_flatbuffers_java url: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/google/flatbuffers/master/LICENSE.txt

I found https://raw.githubusercontent.com/google/flatbuffers/master/LICENSE.txt is renamed to https://raw.githubusercontent.com/google/flatbuffers/master/LICENSE
but in pom.xml the url is not updated.

Please help update or have both LICENSE.txt and LICENSE there because old versions are all still using .txt to verify the license .

Thanks

@dbaileychess
Copy link
Collaborator

@CodeMaster7000 you made this change in #7808. Can you take a look?

@CodeMaster7000
Copy link
Contributor

@dbaileychess That PR has already been merged. I will create a separate PR for this one.

@CodeMaster7000
Copy link
Contributor

@dbaileychess Since that PR had been merged, I have created #7849 to fix this issue.

@adiykehler
Copy link

This problem persists for flatbuffer version 1.12.0. I know that the version is rather old, but I have no control over transitive dependencies and version 1.12.0 is still in use by com.google.cloud:google-cloud-bigquery:2.25.0.
It there a possibility to patch this change back the old versions?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants