-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 209
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge cmpopts and cmp package? #136
Comments
The original intention was to design a comparison library that was highly extensible with a small number of options. Implementing That said, from a end-user perspective, I can see how the two being in the same package can be convenient. At this point in time, it's a bit awkward to merge |
Presumably everything in cmpopts would be replaced with a forward to the corresponding symbol in cmp, and marked as deprecated. I think the separation makes a lot of sense from the perspective of the implementation, but it's pretty confusing as a user. Even as a user with an above-average understanding of cmp's internals. |
I came here to ask the same question as @zombiezen. I just want to point out that the So I would also encourage merging the two packages to make the documentation easier to use. |
As a semi-frequent user of the
cmp
package, most of the time I pull up godoc.org reference is to figure out whether a particular useful option is incmpopts
or thecmp
package. Genuinely curious: is there a meaningful end-user benefit to keeping these packages separate? I seldom usecmp
withoutcmpopts
, and I suspect this is common./cc @dsnet
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: