Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

implement array slicing #106

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 29, 2016
Merged

implement array slicing #106

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 29, 2016

Conversation

mikedanese
Copy link
Contributor

Incomplete pass at #101

$ cat exp.jsonnet 
local arr = std.range(0, 10);
arr[5:7]
$ ./jsonnet exp.jsonnet
[
   5,
   6
]

@mikedanese
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just pushed support for [:4] and [4:] notations

$  jsonnet git:(slice) ✗ cat exp.jsonnet 
local arr = std.range(0, 10);
{
    foo: arr[5:7],
    bar: arr[:7],
    baz: arr[5:],
}
$  jsonnet git:(slice) ✗ ./jsonnet exp.jsonnet 
{
   "bar": [
      0,
      1,
      2,
      3,
      4,
      5,
      6
   ],
   "baz": [
      5,
      6,
      7,
      8,
      9,
      10
   ],
   "foo": [
      5,
      6
   ]
}

@mikedanese mikedanese changed the title WIP: implement array slicing implement array slicing Feb 17, 2016
@mikedanese
Copy link
Contributor Author

This doesn't support step parameter yet.

@@ -317,6 +318,15 @@ struct Index : public AST {
{ }
};

struct Slice : public AST {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there an advantage to having this as a separate AST if it can only be used inside the [ ] of an Index AST?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Basically you could extend Index to add the last and step ASTs which are null if they're not provided.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@sparkprime
Copy link
Contributor

Good work! Sorry it took me a few days to get around to reviewing it.

@@ -88,6 +88,9 @@ limitations under the License.
range(from, to)::
std.makeArray(to - from + 1, function(i) i + from),

slice(arr, from, to)::
std.makeArray(to - from, function(i) arr[i + from]),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should also work on strings and fail explicitly if arr is not a string or array type. There is already str.substr but its semantics aren't right (see comment below). So we should deprecate str.substr() and use this instead.

@mikedanese
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok, I need to implement the python behavior in std.slice now.

@mikedanese
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've implemented python behavior for all positive value (index, end, step) inputs. I think it's reasonable to support negative inputs later on.

//{
// input: arr[::],
// output: arr,
//},
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sparkprime This is breaking with:

FAIL (exit code): slice.sugar.jsonnet
This run's output:
STATIC ERROR: slice.sugar.jsonnet:32:21-22: Not a unary operator: ::

I'll investigate what is going on but it's not immediately obvious to me.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh this is bad unfortunately -- { x:: 3 } is lexed as the single token ::

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess you can change the parser to check for that, a bit like C++ does with

C<vector<int>>

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A workaround is also to do [ : : ]

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can do it without push() but it requires a whole nother branch which feels gross

if (ast->end != nullptr) {
desugar(ast->end, obj_level);
} else {
ast->end = length(ast->target);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you desugared them to null, you could test for null in std.slice and implement the full semantics that way

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

>>> [1,2,3][None:None:None]
[1, 2, 3]

In fact this is mandatory for python compatibility :)

@mikedanese
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sparkprime addressed all review comments.

else
slice + [ invar.indexable[cur] ],
cur + invar.step
) tailstrict;
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

O(n^2) :( but would rather optimize this in the vm for array concatinations where one side is not used again.

$ jsonnet git:(slice): cat exp.jsonnet 
std.range(0, std.extVar("vars").count)[2:100000000000:2]
$ jsonnet git:(slice): time ./jsonnet --code-var vars='{"count": 1000}' exp.jsonnet > /dev/null 
./jsonnet --code-var vars='{"count": 1000}' exp.jsonnet > /dev/null  0.25s user 0.00s system 99% cpu 0.258 total
$ jsonnet git:(slice): time ./jsonnet --code-var vars='{"count": 10000}' exp.jsonnet > /dev/null                                                                                             
./jsonnet --code-var vars='{"count": 10000}' exp.jsonnet > /dev/null  1.98s user 0.01s system 99% cpu 1.990 total
$ jsonnet git:(slice): time ./jsonnet --code-var vars='{"count": 100000}' exp.jsonnet > /dev/null
./jsonnet --code-var vars='{"count": 100000}' exp.jsonnet > /dev/null  46.23s user 0.30s system 99% cpu 46.594 total

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes I am not sure how to solve this. There are various instances of it throughout the code.

The Python approach is to make std.join O(n) and then do everything in terms of that.

Currently std.join is O(n^2) and making it O(n) would mean making it native.

There may be a better way though.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm curious about implementing the internal representation with a persistent data structure. Arrays could still be copy on write minus the deep copy.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants