Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Layer File for klayout ? #18

Open
ratul619 opened this issue Nov 24, 2021 · 6 comments
Open

Layer File for klayout ? #18

ratul619 opened this issue Nov 24, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@ratul619
Copy link

Hi ,

in the GDS files i see new layers - are the layer files ".lyp / .lyt " released in any area ?

Thanks

@mithro
Copy link
Contributor

mithro commented Nov 24, 2021

No KLayout config exists yet. Someone will need to create one based on the documentation which can be found at https://sky130-fd-pr-reram.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user_guide.html

@ratul619
Copy link
Author

@mithro Ok

I have further confusion about the PDF layers.

  1. When i load the GDS file : rram_cell.gds inside cells directory , i see the cell is built with below layers. Referring to the layer table & the shared link - i can make out below ? Is the following table correct ?

68/5 : BE txt
68/16 : via (connected from RRAM top electrode to met2)
68/20 : cviam
68/44 : r1c
69/5 – TE text
69/16 : r1v
69/20 : via (connected from RRAM bottom electrode to met1)

  1. Also not able to make out the layer refer to layer # 221/20 ? What is the use of this layer ? Boundary only ?

Thanks

@RTimothyEdwards
Copy link
Collaborator

RTimothyEdwards commented Nov 25, 2021

@ratul619 : Layer 201:20 (edit: fixed typo in layer number) is the ReRAM. The rest of the layer:purpose pairs are standard sky130 assignments. Your table is pretty much all wrong.

68/5: metal1 text
68/16: metal1 pin
68/20: metal1
68/44: via1
69/5: metal2 text
69/16: metal2 pin
69/20: metal2

@ratul619
Copy link
Author

@RTimothyEdwards apologies !

@proppy
Copy link
Member

proppy commented Mar 8, 2023

@ratul619 @RTimothyEdwards did you mean 201:20?

@RTimothyEdwards
Copy link
Collaborator

@proppy : Yes, that was a typo. 201:20.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants