-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 84
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Remove flushAll method #850
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #850 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 80.74% 80.71% -0.03%
+ Complexity 990 987 -3
============================================
Files 74 74
Lines 5317 5306 -11
Branches 413 412 -1
============================================
- Hits 4293 4283 -10
+ Misses 849 848 -1
Partials 175 175
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Merge-on-green attempted to merge your PR for 6 hours, but it was not mergeable because either one of your required status checks failed, one of your required reviews was not approved, or there is a do not merge label. Learn more about your required status checks here: https://help.github.com/en/github/administering-a-repository/enabling-required-status-checks. You can remove and reapply the label to re-run the bot. |
* | ||
* @throws Exception | ||
*/ | ||
public void flushAll(long timeoutMillis) throws Exception { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@yirutang Would you explain whether this removal is a backward compatible change from the library users's perspective?
(I'm surveying how much CLIRR helps Java libraries to follow semantic versioning or not)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As of now I am pretty sure, there is no user on this. We would eventually provide this method but there is still some dispute about this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Got it. Thanks.
Fixes a NullPointerException introduced in googleapis#841 which occured when trying to check the the requesterPays status of a file while authenticated with an invalid service account. Refs: googleapis#849, googleapis#841
Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:
Fixes #<issue_number_goes_here> ☕️