Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Remove flushAll method #850

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 19, 2021
Merged

fix: Remove flushAll method #850

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 19, 2021

Conversation

yirutang
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:

  • Make sure to open an issue as a bug/issue before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea
  • Ensure the tests and linter pass
  • Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
  • Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)

Fixes #<issue_number_goes_here> ☕️

@yirutang yirutang requested a review from a team February 18, 2021 00:05
@yirutang yirutang requested a review from a team as a code owner February 18, 2021 00:05
@yirutang yirutang requested a review from tswast February 18, 2021 00:05
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the api: bigquerystorage Issues related to the googleapis/java-bigquerystorage API. label Feb 18, 2021
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Feb 18, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 18, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #850 (8b0379c) into master (87a37d9) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #850      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     80.74%   80.71%   -0.03%     
+ Complexity      990      987       -3     
============================================
  Files            74       74              
  Lines          5317     5306      -11     
  Branches        413      412       -1     
============================================
- Hits           4293     4283      -10     
+ Misses          849      848       -1     
  Partials        175      175              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...e/cloud/bigquery/storage/v1beta2/StreamWriter.java 84.17% <ø> (+0.05%) 35.00 <0.00> (-1.00) ⬆️
.../google/cloud/bigquery/storage/v1beta2/Waiter.java 53.93% <0.00%> (-1.13%) 12.00% <0.00%> (-2.00%)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 87a37d9...ac22732. Read the comment docs.

@stephaniewang526 stephaniewang526 added the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Feb 18, 2021
@gcf-merge-on-green
Copy link

Merge-on-green attempted to merge your PR for 6 hours, but it was not mergeable because either one of your required status checks failed, one of your required reviews was not approved, or there is a do not merge label. Learn more about your required status checks here: https://help.github.com/en/github/administering-a-repository/enabling-required-status-checks. You can remove and reapply the label to re-run the bot.

@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot removed the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Feb 19, 2021
@stephaniewang526 stephaniewang526 merged commit 33a4502 into googleapis:master Feb 19, 2021
*
* @throws Exception
*/
public void flushAll(long timeoutMillis) throws Exception {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@yirutang Would you explain whether this removal is a backward compatible change from the library users's perspective?

(I'm surveying how much CLIRR helps Java libraries to follow semantic versioning or not)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As of now I am pretty sure, there is no user on this. We would eventually provide this method but there is still some dispute about this.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it. Thanks.

@yirutang yirutang deleted the remove-flushall branch April 30, 2021 19:00
shubhwip pushed a commit to shubhwip/java-bigquerystorage that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2023
Fixes a NullPointerException introduced in googleapis#841 which occured when trying
to check the the requesterPays status of a file while authenticated with an
invalid service account.

Refs: googleapis#849, googleapis#841
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: bigquerystorage Issues related to the googleapis/java-bigquerystorage API. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants