Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: fix Storage#readAllBytes to allow reading compressed bytes #2304

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2023

Conversation

BenWhitehead
Copy link
Collaborator

Storage#readAllBytes currently ignores BlobSourceOption.shouldReturnRawInputStream(true), fix this so that the option is respected.

Update grpc transport default compression handling for each of the following methods, so it is the same behavior as HTTP:

  • GrpcStorage.Impl#readAllBytes
  • GrpcStorage.Impl#downloadTo(BlobInfo, Path)
  • GrpcStorage.Impl#downloadTo(BlobInfo, OutputStream)

Move the tow tests from ITDownloadToTest into new ITAutomaticGzipDecompressionTest which tests compression handling for all read paths.

@BenWhitehead BenWhitehead added the owlbot:ignore instruct owl-bot to ignore a PR label Nov 15, 2023
@BenWhitehead BenWhitehead requested a review from a team as a code owner November 15, 2023 18:51
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: l Pull request size is large. api: storage Issues related to the googleapis/java-storage API. labels Nov 15, 2023
Storage#readAllBytes currently ignores BlobSourceOption.shouldReturnRawInputStream(true), fix this so that the option is respected.

Update grpc transport default compression handling for each of the following methods, so it is the same behavior as HTTP:
* GrpcStorage.Impl#readAllBytes
* GrpcStorage.Impl#downloadTo(BlobInfo, Path)
* GrpcStorage.Impl#downloadTo(BlobInfo, OutputStream)

Move the tow tests from ITDownloadToTest into new ITAutomaticGzipDecompressionTest which tests compression handling for all read paths.
@BenWhitehead BenWhitehead merged commit 68b96a9 into main Nov 15, 2023
20 checks passed
@BenWhitehead BenWhitehead deleted the fix/auto-gzip-handling branch November 15, 2023 23:36
sydney-munro added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2023
gcf-merge-on-green bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2023
#2330)

…es (#2304)"

This reverts commit 68b96a9.

Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:
- [ ] Make sure to open an issue as a [bug/issue](https://github.com/googleapis/java-storage/issues/new/choose) before writing your code!  That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea
- [ ] Ensure the tests and linter pass
- [ ] Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
- [ ] Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)

Fixes #<issue_number_goes_here> ☕️

If you write sample code, please follow the [samples format](
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/java-docs-samples/blob/main/SAMPLE_FORMAT.md).
sydney-munro added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2023
…d byt… (#2330)

…es (#2304)"

This reverts commit 68b96a9.

Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:
- [ ] Make sure to open an issue as a [bug/issue](https://github.com/googleapis/java-storage/issues/new/choose) before writing your code!  That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea
- [ ] Ensure the tests and linter pass
- [ ] Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
- [ ] Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)

Fixes #<issue_number_goes_here> ☕️

If you write sample code, please follow the [samples format](
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/java-docs-samples/blob/main/SAMPLE_FORMAT.md).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: storage Issues related to the googleapis/java-storage API. owlbot:ignore instruct owl-bot to ignore a PR size: l Pull request size is large.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants