-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 77
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: improve error detection and reporting for BlobWriteChannel retry state #846
fix: improve error detection and reporting for BlobWriteChannel retry state #846
Conversation
… state Add new checks to ensure a more informative error than NullPointerException is thrown if the StorageObject or it's size are unable to be resolved on the last chunk. Fixes #839
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Generally seems like a good improvement, one question
localPosition, | ||
remotePosition, | ||
last, | ||
"Unable to recover in upload.\nThis may be a symptom of multiple clients uploading to the same upload session."); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think multiple clients uploading to the same session is possible? The session should be created by the client and then only used by that client AFAIK.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@frankyn Do you have context on why this was the original message? (I refactored it to a parameter so I could reuse the details formatting code).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's possible if the upload URI is shared between clients. GCS API supports it, however it's very unlikely it's a possible case.
🤖 I have created a release \*beep\* \*boop\* --- ## [1.115.0](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-storage/compare/v1.114.0...v1.115.0) (2021-06-01) ### Features * add `gcf-owl-bot[bot]` to `ignoreAuthors` ([#837](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-storage/issues/837)) ([fe8e98a](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-storage/commit/fe8e98a229f472c1f29d206d937690660bfa1444)) ### Bug Fixes * improve error detection and reporting for BlobWriteChannel retry state ([#846](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-storage/issues/846)) ([d0f2184](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-storage/commit/d0f2184f4dd2d99a4315f260f35421358d14a2df)), closes [#839](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-storage/issues/839) * update BucketInfo translation code to properly handle lifecycle rules ([#852](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-storage/issues/852)) ([3b1df1d](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-storage/commit/3b1df1d00a459b134103bc8738f0294188502a37)), closes [#850](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-storage/issues/850) ### Dependencies * update dependency com.google.cloud:google-cloud-shared-dependencies to v1.2.0 ([#836](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-storage/issues/836)) ([c1752ce](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-storage/commit/c1752ce17d5d723d0ea36c41d98ae2bc9201fec2)) * update kms.version to v0.88.4 ([#830](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-storage/issues/830)) ([7e3dc28](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-storage/commit/7e3dc287e4285a9312393179671a78c569e7e869)) * update kms.version to v0.89.0 ([#855](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-storage/issues/855)) ([29236e9](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-storage/commit/29236e9d2eefb0e64b1b9bbfc532f4c3ae3e9ea4)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
* feat: Remove client side vaildation for lifecycle conditions (#816) * Remove client side vaildation for lifecycle conditions * fix lint and suggest updating (cherry picked from commit 5ec84cc) * fix: update BucketInfo translation code to properly handle lifecycle rules (#852) Fixes #850 (cherry picked from commit 3b1df1d) * fix: improve error detection and reporting for BlobWriteChannel retry state (#846) Add new checks to ensure a more informative error than NullPointerException is thrown if the StorageObject or it's size are unable to be resolved on the last chunk. Fixes #839 (cherry picked from commit d0f2184) * fix: correct lastChunk retry logic in BlobWriteChannel (#918) Add new method StorageRpc#queryResumableUpload which allows getting a shallow StorageObject for a resumable upload session which is complete. Update BlobWriteChannel to use StoageRpc#queryResumableUpload instead of StorageRpc#get when attempting to validate the upload size of an object when it determines the upload is complete and is on the last chunk. If a BlobWriteChannel is opened with a conditional like IfGenerationMatch it is not possible to simply get the object, as the object can drift generationally while the resumable upload is being performed. Related to #839 (cherry picked from commit ab0228c) * test: remove error string matching (#861) It looks like the text for this error on the backend has changed (sometimes) from "Precondition Failed" to "At least one of the pre-conditions you specified did not hold". I don't think it's really necessary to check the exact message in any case given that we do check for a code of 412, which implies a precondition failure. I added a check of the error Reason instead, which is more standardized. Fixes #853 (cherry picked from commit 146a3d3) Co-authored-by: JesseLovelace <43148100+JesseLovelace@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Chris Cotter <cjcotter@google.com>
Add new checks to ensure a more informative error than NullPointerException is thrown if the StorageObject or it's size are unable to be resolved on the last chunk.
Fixes #839