Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

pipeline: packager – should we support release attachments to get binaries? #230

Closed
graphicore opened this issue Jul 29, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

pipeline: packager – should we support release attachments to get binaries? #230

graphicore opened this issue Jul 29, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@graphicore
Copy link
Contributor

Note, we can discuss this with only GitHub in mind, but since this came up in connection with SMC font projects, GitLab release attachments should be considered as well.

I'm not sure if and how this should be implemented in detail. We would probably start with getting the correct to download URL, examples:

GitHub: (I don't have an example at hand.)
GitLab: https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/490109/jobs/artifacts/Version1.810/raw/build/manjari-Version1.810.tar.gz?job=build-tag

cc @santhoshtr, @davelab6, @m4rc1e
This was referenced Jul 29, 2020
Open
Open
@graphicore
Copy link
Contributor Author

Related #231 and googlefonts/gf-docs#75

@simoncozens
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed in #508.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@simoncozens @graphicore