-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 813
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for dynamic port ranges #299
Comments
Actually, I guess there should be support for static port ranges as well, why not? |
'This issue is marked as Stale due to inactivity for more than 30 days. To avoid being marked as 'stale' please add 'awaiting-maintainer' label or add a comment. Thank you for your contributions ' |
Reopening - looks like a bug in the bot. Should still be stale though. |
'This issue is marked as Stale due to inactivity for more than 30 days. To avoid being marked as 'stale' please add 'awaiting-maintainer' label or add a comment. Thank you for your contributions ' |
This issue is marked as obsolete due to inactivity for last 60 days. To avoid issue getting closed in next 30 days, please add a comment or add 'awaiting-maintainer' label. Thank you for your contributions |
We are closing this as there was no activity in this issue for last 90 days. Please reopen if you’d like to discuss anything further. |
Currently, we can describe only one port at a time.
There are servers that use a continuous range of ports (i.e. 7000-7010).
When using dynamic port allocation, if we specify each port independently, they will be shuffled across the allocation range and will not be continuous anymore.
We need thus a dynamic allocation method for a range of ports that randomizes only the beginning of the range, keeping the range together (i.e. 7000-7010 becomes 4124-4134)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: