Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Improve fleet scaling performance #483

Closed
jkowalski opened this issue Jan 9, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Improve fleet scaling performance #483

jkowalski opened this issue Jan 9, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
@jkowalski
Labels
area/performance Anything to do with Agones being slow, or making it go faster.
Milestone
0.11.0

Comments

@jkowalski
Copy link
Contributor

jkowalski commented Jan 9, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Currently when spinning up a large test fleet (10K GameServers) the Game Servers and pods are created relatively slowly (about 1 per second, measured on regional GKE cluster with 150 nodes * (8 cores + 8 GB RAM each)).

I think we're unnecessarily serializing something - in principle there should be no reason why this would be significantly slower than a deployment (which creates all pods almost instantaneously and they run in parallel).
@markmandel markmandel added the area/performance Anything to do with Agones being slow, or making it go faster. label Jan 16, 2019
@jkowalski jkowalski mentioned this issue Jan 29, 2019
Closed
5 tasks
@markmandel
Copy link
Member

@jkowalski can we close this ticket now? I feel like we have acceptable performance at this stage?

@markmandel markmandel added this to the 0.11.0 milestone May 23, 2019
@markmandel
Copy link
Member

Going to close this ticket, as I think we've reached out goals here for now.

Please feel free to reopen if we need to.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jkowalski jkowalski

Labels
area/performance Anything to do with Agones being slow, or making it go faster.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.11.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jkowalski @markmandel